From Collegial Governance to Boardism: Reconfiguring Governance in Higher Education
From Collegial Governance to Boardism: Reconfiguring Governance in Higher Education
复制标题
从学院治理到董事会制：重构高等教育治理
DOI：
10.1007/978-1-137-45617-5_22
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Amaral
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Amélia Veiga;António Magalhães;A. Amaral
直到世纪的最后25年，许多欧洲大学一直主要由学者管理，国家充当缓冲区，保护高等教育机构和学者免受外部利益的干扰（Neave，2012），并对非学术事务拥有统治权。从规范的立场来看，不到半个世纪前，穆迪和尤斯塔斯仍然认为，在大学里，"最高权威.（穆迪和尤斯塔斯，1974年，第233页），Burton Clark（1983）他认为，采用基于有组织的无政府状态隐喻的模型将更适合于允许个人和研究团队解放他们的创造力，产生创新的想法。
Until the last quarter of the 20th century, many European universities had been primarily governed by academics, and the state acted as a buffer protecting higher education institutions and academics from the interference of external interests (Neave, 2012) and held ruling power over non-academic matters. From a normative stance, less than half a century ago, Moodie and Eustace still considered that in universities, ‘the supreme authority … must … continue to rest with the academics’ (Moodie and Eustace, 1974, p. 233), and Burton Clark (1983) argued that the adoption of models based on the metaphor oforganized anarchywould be more appropriate for allowing individuals and research teams to liberate their inventive capacity and to produce innovative ideas.