Beyond bouncing back? Comparing and contesting urban resilience frames in US and Latin American contexts
Beyond bouncing back? Comparing and contesting urban resilience frames in US and Latin American contexts
复制标题
除了反弹之外？
DOI：
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104173
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
9.1
通讯作者：
Gim, Changdeok
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Muñoz-Erickson, Tischa A.;Meerow, Sara;Hobbins, Robert;Cook, Elizabeth;Iwaniec, David M.;Berbés-Blázquez, Marta;Grimm, Nancy B.;Barnett, Allain;Cordero, Jan;Gim, Changdeok
城市复原力在规划和政策中得到了广泛的重视，以提高城市科普气候变化的能力。虽然许多研究讨论了学者们定义复原力的不同方式，但很少有人注意到复原力是如何在不同的城市背景下以及在“实地”建设复原力的行为者中概念化的。鉴于复原力框架可能对所追求的解决方案（以及谁从中受益）产生影响，必须研究城市复原力的变革性定义如何付诸实践。在本文中，我们使用的数据，从九个美国和拉丁美洲和加勒比地区的城市调查，探讨如何在多个治理部门，包括政府，非政府，商业，研究和混合组织的概念框架。我们研究这些框架在最近的概念发展和紧张局势的文献中发现。结果强调，在一般的九个城市，框架收敛与弹性的定义，抵抗，科普，或反弹到以前的条件的能力，而可持续性，公平性和社会生态技术系统（SETS）的观点很少与弹性。各城市和治理行为体之间存在明显差异，这表明在复原力的概念化方面存在地理和政治差异。我们解开这些差异，并讨论他们的影响韧性研究和实践向前迈进。我们认为，如果弹性将继续成为未来城市政策的主要目标，它需要以一种更具变革性，前瞻性和公平的方式来构思，并承认相互关联的SETS。
Urban resilience has gained considerable popularity in planning and policy to address cities’ capacity to cope with climate change. While many studies discuss the different ways that academics define resilience, little attention has been given to how resilience is conceptualized across different urban contexts and among the actors that engage in building resilience ‘on the ground’. Given the implications that resilience frames can have for the solutions that are pursued (and who benefits from them), it is important to examine how transformative definitions of urban resilience are in practice. In this paper, we use data from a survey of nine US and Latin American and Caribbean cities to explore how the concept is framed across multiple governance sectors, including governmental, non-governmental, business, research, and hybrid organizations. We examine these framings in light of recent conceptual developments and tensions found in the literature. The results highlight that, in general across the nine cities, framings converge with definitions of resilience as the ability to resist, cope with, or bounce back to previous conditions, whereas sustainability, equity, and social-ecological-technological systems (SETS) perspectives are rarely associated with resilience. There are noticeable differences across cities and governance actors that point to geographic and political variation in the way resilience is conceptualized. We unpack these differences and discuss their implications for resilience research and practice moving forward. We argue that if resilience is going to remain a major goal for city policies into the future, it needs to be conceived in a more transformative, anticipatory, and equitable way, and acknowledge interconnected SETS.
登录
查看更多内容
动荡的世界。
影响因子：
1.9
作者：
J. Oldham
通讯作者：
J. Oldham
气候变化话语和政策的社会正义框架：牙买加农业景观的适应、恢复力和脆弱性。
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
J. Popke;S. Curtis;D. Gamble
通讯作者：
D. Gamble
DOI：
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.01.001
发表时间：
2019-01-01
影响因子：
8.9
作者：
Borie, Maud;Pelling, Mark;Hyams, Keith
通讯作者：
Hyams, Keith
可持续发展转型
DOI：
10.1017/9781108766975
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change
影响因子：
--
作者：
B. Linnér;Victoria Wibeck
通讯作者：
Victoria Wibeck
解决美国当地气候适应规划的不确定性
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
M. Stults;Larissa Larsen
通讯作者：
Larissa Larsen