Governing Inside the Organization: Interpreting Regulation and Compliance1

Governing Inside the Organization: Interpreting Regulation and Compliance1
复制标题

组织内部治理:解释法规和合规性1

DOI:
10.1086/677187
复制
发表时间:
2014
影响因子:
4.4
通讯作者:
S. Silbey
S. Silbey
中科院分区:
法学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Garry Gray;S. Silbey

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在不同的位置,专业知识和自主权的行为者在组织内部看,作者使用多站点的安全实践的人种学数据,制定一个类型的监管机构,作为监管过程中的焦点演员,是如何在组织内解释。研究结果表明,组织行为者表达监管机构的盟友,威胁和障碍,组织的专业知识,权威和组织成员和监管机构之间的关系的连续性而异的建设。本文对当前对组织治理和法规遵从性的理解做出了三个贡献,从而扩展了组织行为与环境的制度和生态解释。首先,作者不仅记录了组织间的差异,还记录了组织内的可变合规性。第二,所描述的差异并不是来自不同的制度逻辑,而是来自每个组织内部的职位、自主权和专业知识的差异。从他们的扎根理论,作者假设,这些结构进行不同的规范性解释的规定和遵守的概率,因此,第三个贡献,类型学,当与组织层次结构提供了微观层面的行动和话语和组织绩效之间的联系。
Looking inside organizations at the different positions, expertise, and autonomy of the actors, the authors use multisite ethnographic data on safety practices to develop a typology of how the regulator, as the focal actor in the regulatory process, is interpreted within organizations. The findings show that organizational actors express constructions of the regulator as an ally, threat, and obstacle that vary with organizational expertise, authority, and continuity of relationship between the organizational member and the regulator. The article makes three contributions to the current understandings of organizational governance and regulatory compliance, thereby extending both institutional and ecological accounts of organizations’ behavior with respect to their environments. First, the authors document not only variation across organizations but variable compliance within an organization. Second, the variations described do not derive from alternative institutional logics, but from variations in positions, autonomy, and expertise within each organization. From their grounded theory, the authors hypothesize that these constructions carry differential normative interpretations of regulation and probabilities for compliance, and thus the third contribution, the typology, when correlated with organizational hierarchy provides the link between microlevel action and discourse and organizational performance.