"Stakeholder" attitudes over time toward the closing of a state hospital.
"Stakeholder" attitudes over time toward the closing of a state hospital.
复制标题
随着时间的推移，“利益相关者”对关闭州立医院的态度。
DOI：
10.1007/bf02287276
复制
发表时间：
1999
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Kikuzawa,S
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Pescosolido,BA;Wright,ER;Kikuzawa,S
对于四组患者（N=80），他们的家属或护理人员（N=120），医院工作人员（N=124）和公众（N=108），随着时间的推移，对关闭唯一的长期城市公立医院的决定的态度进行了追踪。最初，患者最支持结束决定（65.4%），其次是家属（39.8%），公众（27.8%）和工人（10.4%）。所有团体中的大多数都赞成修复医院。几乎一半的客户和超过一半的其他利益相关者表达了对无家可归的担忧。尽管受访者的社会人口特征不同，但大多数态度是一致的。尽管个人的立场发生了很大的变化，但群体态度的总体概况仍然非常稳定。公众对修复医院的支持大幅下降，利益攸关方在无家可归问题上的分歧也消失了。这些发现强调了确定不同群体立场的重要性，并认识到即使在大规模和成功的政策变革下，利益相关者的反应也在缓慢变化。
For four groups—patients (N=80), their families or lay caregivers (N=120), hospital workers (N=124), and the public (N=108)—attitudes toward the decision to close the only long-term, urban state hospital are traced over time. Initially, patients were most supportive of the closing decision (65.4%), followed by family members (39.8%), the general public (27.8%), and workers (10.4%). A majority of all groups favored fixing the hospital. Almost half of the clients and more than half of other stakeholders expressed concerns about homelessness. Most attitudes were consistent despite respondents' sociodemographic characteristics. The overall profile of group attitudes remained remarkably stable, although there was a good deal of change in individuals' positions. Public support for fixing the hospital decreased significantly, and differences among stakeholders regarding homelessness disappeared. These findings reinforce the importance of ascertaining different constituencies' positions and recognizing the slowly changing response of stakeholders even under massive and successful policy change.