Genetic determinants of spindle pole body duplication in budding yeast.
Genetic determinants of spindle pole body duplication in budding yeast.
复制标题
芽殖酵母纺锤体极体复制的遗传决定因素。
DOI:
10.1101/sqb.1991.056.01.079
复制
发表时间:
1991
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Byers,B
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Winey,M;Baum,P;Goetsch,L;Byers,B
A key function in the eukaryotic cell cycle is the formation of the bipolar mitotic spindle. This complex process depends in turn on duplication of the centrosome, which arises from the single spindle pole inherited by each daughter cell from the preceding mitotic division. The nature of this duplication and its mode of regulation remain somewhat obscure, for the centrosome usually is identifiable only as a poorly defined array of amorphous material from which the majority of microtubules appear to emanate. In animal cells, the centrioles that lie within the core of the centrosome provide a distinctive marker for centrosomal distribution (Mclntosh 1983), but the precise behavior of the diffusely arrayed centrosomal material that surrounds them is difficult to specify. In contrast, the analogous material in yeast and other fungi appears as a discrete organelle--the spindle pole body (SPB)--whose pattern of duplication can be recognized more readily (Byers and Goetsch 1975). The SPB of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a multilayered disk of darkly staining material embedded in the nuclear envelope, where it serves as a site for the assembly of microtubules from both its nuclear and cytoplasmic faces (Moens and Rapport 1971). A distinctive bilaminar structure, the halfbridge, which appears to represent a modified segment of the nuclear envelope, abuts one edge of the SPB and seems to play a major role in SPB duplication. The initial phase of duplication is signaled by the appearance of the satellite on the outer surface of the halfbridge; this small structure appears to be of material similar to that of the SPB proper. Although no other intermediate stages have been detected, SPB duplication then seems to entail an expansion of the satellite and its insertion in the nuclear envelope, thus transforming the half-bridge into a complete bridge. Upon insertion of the SPB into the envelope, microtubules arise on its nuclear face. At a later stage, the bridge is severed and the SPBs undergo separation from one another as the spindle forms. Many cdc mutations cause states of arrest in which the SPB duplication cycle remains well coordinated with other aspects of the cell division cycle (Byers and Goetsch 1974). Other work has shown, however, that cdc31 is unique among cdc mutations in uncoupling these processes, inhibiting satellite formation and SPB duplication, but not bud formation or chromosomal DNA replication. This brings the mutant cell into a condition leading to monopolar mitosis; the chromosomes all pass to the sole functional pole, resulting in polyploidization of the one daughter cell surviving a return to permissive conditions. The fact that failure of pole duplication is thus preceded by failure of satellite formation supports the viewpoint that the satellite is a precursor of the nascent SPB. A similar phenotype has been demonstrated for conditional lethality in the KARl gene, which was originally identified by its role in karyogamy but is also known to play a direct role in the SPB duplication cycle (Rose and Fink 1987). We have undertaken to explore the functions of CDC31 and related genes more thoroughly. Cloning and sequence analysis have revealed that Cdc31 is a member of the family of calmodulin-like calcium-binding proteins (Baum et al. 1986), suggesting that CDC31 function may be triggered by a transient release of calcium ions. Execution point analysis of the temperature-sensitive alleles has indicated that there is a critical period for function near the close of one cell cycle if SPB duplication is to occur normally in the next cycle (data not shown). Since satellite formation per se is never seen to occur before the beginning of the cell cycle, we postulate that …