LOTUKO DIALECTS
LOTUKO DIALECTS
复制标题
洛图科方言
DOI:
10.1525/aa.1932.34.4.02a00060
复制
发表时间:
2009
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Driberg
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Driberg
HE short vocabularies 111 to VIII were collected by me for a specific T purpose which should first be explained. They are so short as to have little linguistic value, but there was no time to do more in the course of a rapid tour of the peoples concerned. This accounts for the words selected. They were chosen as the easiest to comprehend through an unfamiliar medium. That is why, for example, “today” was omitted though both “yesterday” and “tomorrow” were included, as experience has shown that “today” may often be mistaken for “now” or “immediately” and vice versa in the first attempts a t securing a new vocabulary. For vocabularies 111, IV, V, and VI, Lotuko was used as the medium of interpretation and a Lotuko-speaking interpreter was employed, whom I was able to check by a slight knowledge of Lotuko and particularly of the Langol dialect of Lotuko. Vocabularies VII and VIII were obtained directly through the medium of Didinga, which is understood by a large number of the members of these two tribes. Vocabularies I and I1 have been included for the purpose of comparison, the former being extracted from Lord Raglan’s paper “The Lotuko Language.”* My purpose in collecting these vocabularies was to find some linguistic clue to the relationships of the various tribes, which would support or disprove certain theories I had formed on cultural grounds. This area was formerly the homeland of the Shilluk-speaking peoples, and from it the different tribes of the Nilotic family moved north and south after the dispersal in the fifteenth century. Ever since then different cultures have been in conflict here, and the mountains have preserved broken remnants of tribes isolated by the inundation of alien peoples into the more accessible plains. I do not here wish to enter into the larger question of the relation be-