eHealth 360°
eHealth 360°
复制标题
电子医疗360°
DOI：
10.1007/978-3-319-49655-9_48
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Tsekleves E
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Tsekleves E
与保健有关的技术所提供的潜在好处与社会、法律的和道德方面的挑战相抵消，这些挑战伴随着这种技术干预所必需的对人们的普遍监测。通过ProtoPolicy研究项目，我们探索了设计小说的生产和使用，作为辩论个人卫生系统的社会，法律的和道德层面的工具。两个设计小说共同创造和测试的一系列设计研讨会与社区团体设在兰开夏郡和康沃尔郡，英国。兰开斯特小组关于智能对象治疗师设计小说的老年人辩论的主题分析突出了与个人健康系统设计相关的社会和伦理问题。我们的结论是，像“可用性”这样的道德规范可能是有益的，它是基于与直接或间接相关的公众的接触，而不应该仅仅由专家设计成创新。
The potential benefits offered by health-related technologies are counterpoised by the societal, legal and ethical challenges concomitant with the pervasive monitoring of people necessitated by such technological interventions. Through the ProtoPolicy research project we explored the production and use of design fictions as a tool for debating the societal, legal and ethical dimensions of personal health systems. Two design fictions were co-created and tested in a series of design workshops with community groups based in Lancashire and Cornwall, UK. A thematic analysis of a debate among older people from the Lancaster group on the Smart Object Therapist design fiction highlighted societal and ethical issues relevant to personal health system design. We conclude that ethics like ‘usability’ may be usefully based on engagement with directly or indirectly implicated publics and should not be designed into innovation by experts alone.