Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis

Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/0013188032000133548
复制
发表时间:
2003-06-01
影响因子:
3.5
通讯作者:
Basit, TN
Basit, TN
中科院分区:
教育学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Basit, TN

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

数据分析是定性研究中最困难也是最关键的方面。编码是分析过程中组织和理解文本数据所采取的重要步骤之一。本文研究了在两个截然不同的项目中使用手动和电子方法对数据进行编码的情况,其中数据主要通过深度访谈收集。作者根据自己的经验研究了这两种方法,并得出结论,选择取决于项目的规模、可用的资金和时间以及研究人员的倾向和专业知识。
Data analysis is the most difficult and most crucial aspect of qualitative research. Coding is one of the significant steps taken during analysis to organize and make sense of textual data. This paper examines the use of manual and electronic methods to code data in two rather different projects in which the data were collected mainly by in-depth interviewing. The author looks at both the methods in the light of her own experience and concludes that the choice will be dependent on the size of the project, the funds and time available, and the inclination and expertise of the researcher.