Real-world observations with prasugrel compared to clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States
Real-world observations with prasugrel compared to clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States
复制标题
DOI:
10.1185/03007995.2014.941055
复制
发表时间:
2014-11-01
影响因子:
2.3
通讯作者:
Effron, Mark B.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bae, Jay P.;Faries, Douglas E.;Effron, Mark B.
Objectives:To compare 30 and 90 day real-world acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and bleeding related rehospitalization rates in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; ACS-PCI) treated with clopidogrel or prasugrel.Research design and methods:Using the Premier hospital database, ACS-PCI patients receiving a drug-eluting (DES) or bare-metal (BMS) stent and clopidogrel or prasugrel from July 2009 to June 2011 were analyzed. Patients were included based on the prasugrel US prescribing information (USPI), excluding patients with a history of transient ischemic attack/stroke and patients >= 75 years without diabetes or prior MI. The primary endpoint was 30 day adjusted AMI rehospitalization rate. Secondary endpoints included 90 day AMI and 30 and 90 day bleeding-related rehospitalization rates. Treatment comparisons were adjusted using propensity score stratification.Results:At the index event, prasugrel patients (N = 9404) differed from clopidogrel patients (N = 74,163) by having a lower risk of comorbid conditions associated with bleeding, being more likely younger and male, having ST-elevation MI and receiving a DES. For clopidogrel and prasugrel, respectively, the observed AMI-related rehospitalization rates were 4.7% and 3.9% at 30 days (p