Older people as active agents in their neighbourhood environments: Moving house can improve quality of life.

Older people as active agents in their neighbourhood environments: Moving house can improve quality of life.
复制标题

老年人是社区环境中的积极参与者:搬家可以提高生活质量。

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
The gerontologist
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Joanne Allen
Joanne Allen
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
C. Stephens;Joanne Allen

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

背景和目标 邻里环境是老年人福祉的一个重要方面。一般生态模型的发展认识到老年人是积极的代理人,他们适应环境,以适应他们不断变化的需求。我们为Wahl等人提出的模型提供了实证支持,通过研究邻里环境、个人情况、搬迁和老年人生活质量之间的相互作用。 研究设计和方法 在2016年(T1)和2018年(T2)进行的新西兰健康,工作和退休纵向调查中,对社区居住参与者(55-89岁)的样本进行了两个统计模型的测试。多元线性回归评估了T1(n = 3682)时住房和邻里关系与生活质量(QoL)的相关性。 结果 生活质量预测的住房满意度,邻里满意度,可访问性,和信任(控制年龄,性别,婚姻状况,房屋所有权,SES,身体健康和心理健康)。混合方差分析表明,那些谁移动的房子之间的T1-T2报告较低的住房和邻里满意度比非搬家者在T1。随着时间的推移T1-T2,搬家者报告的住房满意度下降较少,更积极的变化,所有的邻里观念,更高的邻里可达性的看法比非搬家者在T2。 讨论和影响 这些发现支持了理论模型,并为更详细地研究环境对老年人福祉的影响提供了动力。住房和邻里环境是地方和国家一级社会政策变革的一个非常实际的重点。
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Neighbourhood environments are an important aspect of well-being for older people. Developments of the general ecological model recognise older people as active agents who adapt their environments to fit their changing needs. We provide empirical support for a model suggested by Wahl et al., by examining interactions between neighbourhood environments, personal situations, relocation, and quality of life among older people. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Two statistical models were tested with a sample of community dwelling participants (aged 55-89) in the New Zealand Health, Work and Retirement longitudinal surveys conducted in 2016 (T1) and 2018 (T2). Multiple linear regression assessed the association of perceptions of housing and neighbourhood with quality of life (QoL) at T1 (n = 3682). RESULTS QoL was predicted by housing satisfaction, and neighbourhood satisfaction, accessibility, and trust (controlling for age, gender, marital status, home ownership, SES, physical health and mental health). Mixed ANOVA showed that those who moved house between T1-T2 reported lower housing and neighbourhood satisfaction than non-movers at T1. Over time T1-T2, movers reported less decline in housing satisfaction, and more positive change on all neighbourhood perceptions, with higher perceptions of neighbourhood accessibility than non-movers at T2. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS These findings support the theoretical model and provide impetus for more detailed study of the effects of the environment on well-being in older age. Housing and neighbourhood environments are a very practical focus for social policy change at local and national levels.
生命历程中感知邻里质量的轨迹:社会人口决定因素及其对福祉的影响。
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.11.001
发表时间: 2019
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Stokes,JeffreyE
通讯作者: Stokes,JeffreyE
老年人健康研究中的邻里环境:系统评价。
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.06.022
发表时间: 2009-11
影响因子: 5.5
作者:
Yen, Irene H.;Michael, Yvonne L.;Perdue, Leslie
通讯作者: Perdue, Leslie