Evaluating firm's green supply chain management in linguistic preferences
Evaluating firm's green supply chain management in linguistic preferences
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.08.007
复制
发表时间：
2013-02-01
影响因子：
11.1
通讯作者：
Chiu, Anthony S. F.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Tseng, Ming-Lang;Chiu, Anthony S. F.
人们对公司的环境可持续性活动越来越感兴趣，以改善其供应链中的做法。欧洲和美国严格的环境法规要求制造商在不丧失竞争力的情况下遵守这些法规。本研究以台湾一家印刷电路板制造商为例，寻求实施绿色供应链管理(GSCM)，并选择符合其要求的绿色供应商。选择合适的供应商是制造企业消除环境对供应链管理影响的关键战略方向。公司的标准和供应商选择需要统一为一个系统，以提高公司的业绩。这项研究为案例企业确定了合适的环境和非环境GSCM标准，并开发了以下选择方法：(I)通过定性和定量信息来评估标准和备选方案的权重；以及(Ii)使用灰色关联分析对替代供应商进行排名。结果表明，Alternative 3在四个被评价的供应商中排名第一，在环境管理体系、供应商的盈利能力和关系供应商亲密度这三个重要指标上表现强劲。此外，标准本身的知觉权重与加权备选方案中排名最前的五个相同。(C)2010爱思唯尔有限公司。保留所有权利。
There has been an increasing interest towards firms' environmental sustainability activities to improve practices in their supply chain. Stringent environmental regulations in Europe and US challenge manufacturers to comply with these without losing their competitiveness. This study illustrates the case of a printed circuit board manufacturer in Taiwan that seeks to implement green supply chain management (GSCM) and selects a green supplier to meet its requirements. Choosing the suitable supplier is a key strategic direction in eliminating environmental impact on supply chain management for manufacturing firms. The firm's criteria and supplier selection need to be unified as a system to improve the firm's performance. This study identified the appropriate environmental and non-environmental GSCM criteria for the case firm and developed the following selection method: (i) evaluate the weights of criteria and alternatives as described both by qualitative and quantitative information; and (ii) rank alternative suppliers using a grey relational analysis. The result shows Alternative 3 ranks first among the four evaluated suppliers and demonstrated strong performance in the top three important criteria, namely, environmental management systems, profitability of supplier and relationship supplier closeness. Additionally, the perception weights on criteria itself are same as the most top five in weighted alternative. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.