The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement.
The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885
复制
发表时间：
2015-10
期刊：
影响因子：
15.8
通讯作者：
RECORD Working Committee
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Benchimol EI;Smeeth L;Guttmann A;Harron K;Moher D;Petersen I;Sørensen HT;von Elm E;Langan SM;RECORD Working Committee
出于行政和临床目的而获得的常规收集的健康数据，没有具体的先验研究目标，越来越多地用于研究。这些数据的快速发展和可用性揭示了现有报告指南未解决的问题，例如加强流行病学观察研究报告（STROBE）。使用定期观察收集的健康数据进行的研究报告 (RECORD) 声明的创建是为了填补这些空白。 RECORD 是作为 STROBE 语句的扩展而创建的，旨在使用常规收集的健康数据来处理特定于观察性研究的报告项目。 RECORD 包含 13 个项目的清单，涉及文章的标题、摘要、引言、方法、结果和讨论部分，以及此类研究报告中所需包含的其他信息。本文件包含清单以及解释和详细信息，以增强清单的使用。本文还包括每个记录清单项目的良好报告示例。本文件以及随附的网站和留言板 (http://www.record-statement.org) 将增强 RECORD 的实施和理解。通过实施 RECORD，作者、期刊编辑和同行评审员可以鼓励研究报告的透明度。
Routinely collected health data, obtained for administrative and clinical purposes without specific a priori research goals, are increasingly used for research. The rapid evolution and availability of these data have revealed issues not addressed by existing reporting guidelines, such as Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE). The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely collected health Data (RECORD) statement was created to fill these gaps. RECORD was created as an extension to the STROBE statement to address reporting items specific to observational studies using routinely collected health data. RECORD consists of a checklist of 13 items related to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion section of articles, and other information required for inclusion in such research reports. This document contains the checklist and explanatory and elaboration information to enhance the use of the checklist. Examples of good reporting for each RECORD checklist item are also included herein. This document, as well as the accompanying website and message board (http://www.record-statement.org), will enhance the implementation and understanding of RECORD. Through implementation of RECORD, authors, journals editors, and peer reviewers can encourage transparency of research reporting.