Irony and the discourse of modernity
Irony and the discourse of modernity
复制标题
讽刺与现代性话语
DOI：
10.2307/3508032
复制
发表时间：
1990
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
E. Behler
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
E. Behler
贝勒讨论了现代性和后现代性的思想现状，详细说明了要面对的知识问题，并审查了辩论中的核心人物，如利奥塔，哈贝马斯，罗蒂和德里达的立场。他发现，在“沟通的限度”之外，进一步的讨论必须通过讽刺来进行。现代性概念的历史兴起是通过讨论古代和现代的问题作为与古典传统的突破，以及德斯塔尔，英国浪漫主义者和伟大的德国浪漫主义者施莱格尔，黑格尔和尼采的理论著作来考察的。从柏拉图、苏格拉底到尼采，反讽的概念从一个正式的修辞术语到一种间接的模式，逐渐成为思想和话语的特征，尼采避免使用“反讽”一词，但在他的面具概念中使用了它。
Behler discusses the current state of thought on modernity and postmodernity, detailing the intellectual problems to be faced and examining the positions of such central figures in the debate as Lyotard, Habermas, Rorty, and Derrida. He finds that beyond the "limits of communication," further discussion must be carried out through irony. The historical rise of the concept of modernity is examined through discussions of the querelle des anciens et des modernes as a break with classical tradition, and on the theoretical writings of de Stael, the English romantics, and the great German romantics Schlegel, Hegel, and Nietzsche. The growth of the concept of irony from a formal rhetorical term to a mode of indirectness that comes to characterize thought and discourse generally is then examined from Plato and Socrates to Nietzsche, who avoided the term "irony" but used it in his cetnral concept of the mask.