Evidence-Based Planning
Evidence-Based Planning
复制标题
循证规划
DOI：
10.1080/02513625.2006.10556951
复制
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
H. Rüssmann
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
H. Rüssmann
摘要 本文旨在通过借鉴政策-证据接口的两种模型来概念化英国政府对基于证据的政策兴趣的高涨；工具和启蒙模式。它认为，对证据的热情背后的大部分驱动力植根于线性和功利主义的研究观点，这种观点广泛地基于关于证据的性质、专家的作用以及它们对政策的影响的三个相互关联的误解。通过借鉴英国规划系统的例子，本文探讨了规划和政策过程的“理想”与“现实”世界中证据的使用之间的不匹配。有人认为，20世纪60年代和1970年代实证主义规划观下所做的假设与政策研究界面工具观下所做的假设相似。
Abstract This paper aims to conceptualize the upsurge of governmental interest in evidence-based policy in Britain by drawing on two models of policy-evidence interface; the instrumental and the enlightenment model. It argues that much of the drive behind the enthusiasm for evidence is rooted in the linear and utilitarian view of research which is broadly based on three interrelated misconceptions about the nature of evidence, the role of experts, and the influence that these can have on policy. By drawing on examples from the UK planning systems, the paper explores the mismatch between the use of evidence in the “ideal” and the “real” worlds of planning and policy process. It is argued that the assumption made under the positivist view of planning in the 1960s and 1970s are similar to those made under the instrumental view of the policy-research interface.