From Information Management to Information Visualization Development of Radiology Dashboards
From Information Management to Information Visualization Development of Radiology Dashboards
复制标题
DOI：
10.4338/aci-2015-08-ra-0104
复制
发表时间：
2016-01-01
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Safdari, Reza
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Karami, Mahtab;Safdari, Reza
目的：开发和实施医学影像科（MID）绩效指标仪表板。方法：本研究检索了几篇讨论影像科绩效指标的文章。所有相关措施均已提取。然后，一组成像专家被要求通过开放式问题对这些措施进行评分，以寻求进一步的潜在指标。进行了第二轮以确认绩效评级。然后，执行小组对这些指标及其评级进行了审查。根据最终小组的评级，制定了要使用的指标清单。信息技术顾问团队被要求确定一组用于构建仪表板的用户界面要求。在第一轮中，根据专家组的评级，确定了要使用的主要功能或要求的列表。接下来，使用 Qlikview 来实现仪表板以可视化一组选定的 KPI 指标。最后，对仪表板进行了评估。结果：确定了 92 个 MID 指标。在此基础上，确定了构建仪表板原型的 53 个主要用户界面要求。然后，项目团队成功地将放射学管理仪表板原型应用到研究现场。所设计的可视化展示得到了用户的高度评价。 结论：开发仪表板，信息管理至关重要。建议为MID设计一个高质量的地图。它可用于指定活动的顺序、其相关指标以及计算这些指标所需的数据。为了实现有效的仪表板和全面的运营视图，有必要设计一个数据仓库来从各种系统收集数据。利用互操作性标准在不同系统之间交换数据在这方面也很有效。
Objective: The development and implementation of a dashboard of medical imaging department (MID) performance indicators.Method: Several articles discussing performance measures of imaging departments were searched for this study. All the related measures were extracted. Then, a panel of imaging experts were asked to rate these measures with an open ended question to seek further potential indicators. A second round was performed to confirm the performance rating. The indicators and their ratings were then reviewed by an executive panel. Based on the final panel's rating, a list of indicators to be used was developed. A team of information technology consultants were asked to determine a set of user interface requirements for the building of the dashboard. In the first round, based on the panel's rating, a list of main features or requirements to be used was determined. Next, Qlikview was utilized to implement the dashboard to visualize a set of selected KPI metrics. Finally, an evaluation of the dashboard was performed.Results: 92 MID indicators were identified. On top of this, 53 main user interface requirements to build of the prototype of dashboard were determined. Then, the project team successfully implemented a prototype of radiology management dashboards into study site. The visual display that was designed was rated highly by users.Conclusion: To develop a dashboard, management of information is essential. It is recommended that a quality map be designed for the MID. It can be used to specify the sequence of activities, their related indicators and required data for calculating these indicators. To achieve both an effective dashboard and a comprehensive view of operations, it is necessary to design a data warehouse for gathering data from a variety of systems. Utilizing interoperability standards for exchanging data among different systems can be also effective in this regard.