From Neighbourhood to Integration Policy: Are there concrete alternatives to enlargement?. CEPS Policy Brief No. 95, 1 March 2006
From Neighbourhood to Integration Policy: Are there concrete alternatives to enlargement?. CEPS Policy Brief No. 95, 1 March 2006
复制标题
从邻里政策到一体化政策：是否有扩大规模的具体替代方案？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
E. Landaburu
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
E. Landaburu
在这份新的CEPS政策简报中，作者，欧盟委员会总干事对外关系，探讨了欧盟最新的外交政策工具，欧洲邻国政策（ENP）的效用。Landaburu将ENP描述为一个良性循环，将该政策描述为一个基于共同价值观和开明的自我利益的政策。他认为，通过增加欧盟邻国的繁荣、稳定和安全，并将欧盟的繁荣、稳定和安全投射到其边界之外，它也增加了自己的繁荣、稳定和安全。换句话说，"通过帮助我们的邻居，我们帮助了我们自己"。
In this new CEPS Policy Brief, the author, the Director General of DG External Relations at the European Commission, explores the utility of the EU’s newest foreign policy tool, the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP). Describing the ENP as a virtuous circle, Landaburu characterises the policy as one based on shared values and enlightened self-interest. He argues that by increasing the prosperity, stability and security of the EU’s neighbours and by projecting the EU’s prosperity, stability and security beyond its borders, it increases its own. In other words, “by helping our neighbours, we help ourselves”.