Comparative Investigation of the Dynamic Simulation of Foot Traffic Flow
Comparative Investigation of the Dynamic Simulation of Foot Traffic Flow
复制标题
人流动态模拟对比研究
DOI：
10.1007/978-3-540-47064-9_33
复制
发表时间：
2007
影响因子：
5.6
通讯作者：
W. Klingsch
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Rogsch;A. Seyfried;W. Klingsch
应急路线系统的评价与优化可以采用不同的工程方法来完成。这些方法基于两种不同的原则：宏观方法和微观方法。两者都允许预测各种设置的疏散时间。在作品中，我们研究了简单的设置，包括房间、走廊和楼梯，考虑到疏散时间。这些计算使用当前的计算机模拟程序，基于微观模型，以及Predtechenskii和Milinskii[1]的宏观方法。对于计算机模拟，我们使用ASERI 3.4c, buildingEXODUS V4.0 Level 2, PedGo Version 2.1.1和Simulex 11.1.3。结果表明，即使是最简单的系统，在不同的模拟程序下，疏散时间也有很大的差异，与实验结果有很大的偏差。进一步研究了几何边界条件对疏散时间的影响。
Evaluation and optimization of emergency route systems can be accomplished with different engineering methods. These methods are based on two different principles: the macroscopic and the microscopic approach. Both allow forecasting of evacuation times for various settings. In the work presented simple settings are investigated, consisting of rooms, corridor and stairs with regard to evacuation times. These calculations use current computer simulation programs, based on microscopic models, and the macroscopic method of Predtechenskii and Milinskii [1]. For the computer simulation we used ASERI 3.4c, buildingEXODUS V4.0 Level 2, PedGo Version 2.1.1 and Simulex 11.1.3. The comparison of the results shows that even for the simplest systems evacuation times vary considerably for different simulation programs and deviate from experimental results. Furthermore we investigated effects of geometric boundary conditions on the evacuation time.