Comparison of parameter optimization methods for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
Comparison of parameter optimization methods for quantitative susceptibility mapping.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/mrm.28435
复制
发表时间:
2021-01
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
Tejos C
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Milovic C;Prieto C;Bilgic B;Uribe S;Acosta-Cabronero J;Irarrazaval P;Tejos C
Quantitative susceptibility mapping is usually performed by minimizing a functional with data fidelity and regularization terms. A weighting parameter controls the balance between these terms. There is a need for techniques to find the proper balance that avoids artifact propagation and loss of details. Finding the point of maximum curvature in the L-curve is a popular choice, although slow, often unreliable when using variational penalties, and tends to yield over-regularized results. We propose two alternative approaches to control the balance between the data fidelity and regularization terms: 1) searching for an inflection point in the log-log domain of the L-curve, and 2) comparing frequency components of QSM reconstructions. We compare these methods against the conventional L-curve and U-curve approaches. Our methods achieve predicted parameters that are better correlated with RMSE, HFEN and SSIM-based parameter optimizations than those obtained with traditional methods. The inflection point yields less over-regularization and lower errors than traditional alternatives. The frequency analysis yields more visually appealing results, although with larger RMSE. Our methods provide a robust parameter optimization framework for variational penalties in QSM reconstruction. The L-curve based zero-curvature search produced almost optimal results for typical QSM acquisition settings. The frequency analysis method may use a 1.5–2.0 correction factor to apply it as a standalone method for a wider range of SNR settings. This approach may also benefit from fast search algorithms such as the binary search to speed-up the process.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Langkammer C;Schweser F;Shmueli K;Kames C;Li X;Guo L;Milovic C;Kim J;Wei H;Bredies K;Buch S;Guo Y;Liu Z;Meineke J;Rauscher A;Marques JP;Bilgic B
通讯作者:
Bilgic B
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
Milovic C;Tejos C;Acosta-Cabronero J;Özbay PS;Schwesser F;Marques JP;Irarrazaval P;Bilgic B;Langkammer C
通讯作者:
Langkammer C
DOI:
10.1002/cmr.b.10083
发表时间:
2003-10-01
影响因子:
0.9
作者:
Salomir, R;De Senneville, BD;Moonen, CTW
通讯作者:
Moonen, CTW
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
Chen, Maomao;Su, Han;Luo, Jianwen
通讯作者:
Luo, Jianwen
影响因子:
4
作者:
Chamorro-Servent, Judit;Dubois, Remi;Coudiere, Yves
通讯作者:
Coudiere, Yves