Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice
Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/026999300402763
复制
发表时间：
2000-07-01
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
Keltner, D
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lerner, JS;Keltner, D
大多数关于情感对判断和选择的影响的理论都采用基于价态的方法，对比积极和消极情绪状态的影响。这些方法没有具体说明相同价态的不同情绪是否以及何时会对判断产生不同的影响。在这篇文章中，我们提出了一个情绪特定影响判断和选择的模型。我们假设，每一种情绪都是通过一种倾向来定义的，即以与情绪的原始认知-评估维度一致的方式感知新事件和新对象。为了让价态和评价倾向的方法相互对立，我们提出了一项研究，探讨了两种相同价态但不同评价的情绪--愤怒和恐惧--是否以不同的方式与风险感知有关。与评估倾向假说一致的是，恐惧的人对未来的事件做出悲观的判断，而愤怒的人则做出乐观的判断。在讨论中，我们扩展了所提出的模型，并回顾了支持评价倾向过程的两个社会调节因素的证据。
Most theories of affective influences on judgement and choice take a valence-based approach, contrasting the effects of positive versus negative feeling states. These approaches have not specified if and when distinct emotions of the same valence have different effects on judgement. In this article, we propose a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. We posit that each emotion is defined by a tendency to perceive new events and objects in ways that are consistent with the original cognitive-appraisal dimensions of the emotion. To pit the valence and appraisal-tendency approaches against one another, we present a study that addresses whether two emotions of the same valence but differing appraisals-anger and fear-relate in different ways to risk perception. Consistent with the appraisal-tendency hypothesis, fearful people made pessimistic judgements of future events whereas angry people made optimistic judgements. In the Discussion we expand the proposed model and review evidence supporting two social moderators of appraisal-tendency processes.