Dark matters: on the surveillance of blackness
Dark matters: on the surveillance of blackness
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/14680777.2016.1161347
复制
发表时间：
2016-03
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
R. Gonzales
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Gonzales
在他们的示例和分析中连接到框架。此外，“身体”部分读起来比“激情”和“劳动”更不同，并且具有不容易分配给单一主题的文章。Cupcakes、Pinterest和Ladyporn的优势在于其贡献范围之广，说明了在当代媒体中研究“女性化文化”的重要性。作者令人信服地揭示了针对女性的观众和产品的女性化，并说明了这些重新写入父权制，白色霸权和性别规范的传统边缘化的方式。此外，这本书通过许多印刷图像在视觉上吸引读者，这有助于读者更生动地参与作者的批评和文物。及时的例子和对象的分析激增书的潜力，用于本科生和研究生课堂，例如，在性别与媒体，女权主义媒体研究，批判/文化研究，性别与技术，以及数字媒体的课程。纸杯蛋糕，Pinterest和Ladyporn也可以通过让学生比较和对比媒体文本及其对文化和性别的影响来促进媒体女性化的历史概述。通过其不同的贡献，这本编辑的卷成功地说明了什么“女性化文化”在一个社会中产生痴迷于利基营销和窄播。因此，这本书有效地与当代关于媒体中妇女地位的对话相吻合（阿拉纳A。Ruggiero 2012），女性的数字劳动（布鲁克e. Duffy 2015; Ursula Huws 2014）和后女权主义数字文化（Amy s.多布森2015）。通过对数字媒体、文化产品和性别空间的多方面批评，Cupcakes、Pinterest和Ladyporn有可能重振当代女性主义媒体研究的学术，并使“女性化文化”重新成为焦点。
connecting to the framework in their example and analyses. Additionally, the “Bodies” section reads more disparate than “Passions” and “Labor” and features articles that are not as readily assigned to a singular theme. The strength of Cupcakes, Pinterest, and Ladyporn lies in its sheer range of contributions that illustrate the salience of examining “feminized cultures” in contemporary media. The authors convincingly reveal the feminization of audiences and products targeted towards women and illustrate the ways in which these re-inscribe traditional marginalizations of patriarchy, white supremacy, and gender normativity. Additionally, the book engages its readers visually through many printed images, which aids readers’ ability to engage with the authors’ critiques and artifacts more vividly. The timeliness of the examples and objects of analyses proliferates the book’s potential for use in the undergraduate and graduate classroom, e.g., in coursework on gender and media, feminist media studies, critical/cultural studies, gender and technology, and digital media at large. Cupcakes, Pinterest, and Ladyporn may also facilitate a historical overview of the feminization of media by allowing students to compare and contrast media texts and their effects on culture and gender. Through its diverse contributions, this edited volume successfully illustrates what “feminized cultures” produce in a society obsessed with niche marketing and narrowcasting. Hence, the volume effectively dovetails with contemporary conversations on the depictions of women in media (Alana A. Ruggiero 2012), digital labor by women (Brooke e. Duffy 2015; Ursula Huws 2014), and post-feminist digital cultures (Amy s. Dobson 2015). Through its manifold critiques of digital media, cultural products, and gendered spaces, Cupcakes, Pinterest, and Ladyporn has the potential to reinvigorate contemporary scholarship in feminist media studies and bring “feminized cultures” back into focus.