Following the Rules: Why Small Groups of Tamarins Do Not Reconcile Conflicts
Following the Rules: Why Small Groups of Tamarins Do Not Reconcile Conflicts
复制标题
遵守规则：为什么小群体的狨猴不调解冲突
DOI：
10.1159/000083614
复制
发表时间：
2005
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
Nancy G Caine
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Schaffner;F. Aureli;Nancy G Caine
和解是冲突后敌对双方的友好团聚。最近提出了实现和解的一系列条件和规则。一个关键的条件是，必须破坏对手之间的关系。我们测试了这种情况下，使用冲突后和匹配的控制观察4小组的绢毛猴（Saguinus labiatus）。我们以前缺乏和解的证据得到了证实。因此，预计冲突后关系不会受到损害。我们发现，在食物冲突后，关系受到了干扰，但和其他灵长类动物一样，在这种冲突后，没有证据表明和解;对于非食物相关的冲突，没有证据表明关系受到了干扰，因为对手彼此非常接近，并且在冲突后的观察中恢复了与匹配对照观察中完全相同的活动。我们的结论是，“日常”的侵略可能不会破坏来自同一家庭群体的个人之间的关系，因此不需要和解。
Reconciliation is the post-conflict friendly reunion between opponents. A series of conditions and rules in order for reconciliation to take place has been recently proposed. One critical condition is that the relationship between opponents must be disrupted. We tested this condition using post-conflict and matched-control observations on 4 small groups of tamarins (Saguinus labiatus). Our previous lack of evidence for reconciliation was confirmed. No post-conflict relationship damage was therefore expected. We found evidence that relationships were disturbed following conflicts over food but, as in other primates, no evidence for reconciliation following such conflicts was found. For non-food-related conflicts there was no evidence that relationships were disturbed, as opponents were in close proximity to each other and resumed the exact same activity as frequently in the post-conflict observations as they did in the matched-control observations. We conclude that ‘everyday’ aggression may not disrupt the relationships among individuals from the same family group and therefore reconciliation is not needed.