Sociology. Weaving a richer tapestry in biomedical science.

Sociology. Weaving a richer tapestry in biomedical science.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1126/science.1211704
复制
发表时间:
2011-08-19
期刊:
Science (New York, N.Y.)
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Collins FS
Collins FS
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Tabak LA;Collins FS

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

尽管美国科学界可能希望将自己视为一件由许多不同和丰富多彩的线程组成的单一服装,但对实际数据的坚定考虑提醒我们,我们国家的生物医学研究队伍仍然远未达到应有的富裕程度。由美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)主要支持的一组研究人员进行的一项分析显示,从2000年到2006年,黑人资助申请人获得NIH研究资金的可能性明显低于白色申请人。成功率的差距达10个百分点,即使在控制了教育、原籍国、培训、雇主特征、以前的研究奖项和出版记录之后。他们的分析还显示,亚洲人的差距为4.2个百分点;然而,亚洲人和白色人获奖概率之间的差异是由于将非公民排除在分析之外。
As much as the U.S. scientific community may wish to view itself as a single garment of many diverse and colorful threads, an unflinching consideration of actual data reminds us that our nation's biomedical research workforce remains nowhere near as rich as it could be. An analysis, performed by a team of researchers primarily supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and published in this issue ofScience, reveals that from 2000 to 2006, black grant applicants were significantly less likely to receive NIH research funding than were white applicants. The gap in success rates amounted to 10 percentage points, even after controlling for education, country of origin, training, employer characteristics, previous research awards, and publication record . Their analysis also showed a gap of 4.2 percentage points for Asians; however, the differences between Asian and white award probabilities were explained by exclusion of noncitizens from the analysis.
DOI: 10.1126/science.1196783
发表时间: 2011-08-19
期刊: Science (New York, N.Y.)
影响因子: --
作者:
Ginther DK;Schaffer WT;Schnell J;Masimore B;Liu F;Haak LL;Kington R
通讯作者: Kington R
DOI: 10.1126/science.159.3810.56
发表时间: 1968-01-01
期刊: SCIENCE
影响因子: 56.9
作者:
MERTON, RK
通讯作者: MERTON, RK
DOI: 10.1257/0002828042002561
发表时间: 2004-09-01
影响因子: 10.7
作者:
Bertrand, M;Mullainathan, S
通讯作者: Mullainathan, S