Understanding and supporting search for scholarly knowledge

Understanding and supporting search for scholarly knowledge
复制标题

理解并支持对学术知识的探索

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2011
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Cristhian Parra
Cristhian Parra
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Marcos Báez;Daniil Mirylenka;Cristhian Parra

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在过去的十年里,网络极大地改变了学术交流,使研究传播从期刊上的印刷论文转向可以轻松发布在互联网上的数字内容。这种技术因素沿着着更大的科学界,使得在不断增长的出版物海洋中真的很难找到相关的研究内容。为了深入了解研究人员如何找到相关知识,我们采访了一小群研究人员,然后向更大的群体开放了一个在线调查,要求他们解释他们如何为他们的一篇论文找到参考文献。这项研究的结果表明,发现科学知识具有很强的社会成分,不同研究人员的社交网络(例如,共同作者,在会议上认识的人)占参考文献来源的重要百分比。在本文中,我们报告了这项研究,并将我们的结果与5 × 10作者的出版物和参考文献数据集中发现的证据进行了比较。我们把这些结果,并分析不同的方法,将社会成分的搜索和推荐的科学出版物。
In the last decade, scholarly communication have been greatly transformed by the web, moving research dissemination away from printed papers in journals to digital content that can be easily posted on the Internet. This technical factor along with a larger scientific community makes it really hard to find relevant content for research in the ever growing sea of publications. With the goal of gaining insights on how researchers find relevant knowledge, we have interviewed a small group of researchers and then opened an online survey to a larger group, asking them to explain how they had found references for one of their papers. The results of this study suggest that finding scientific knowledge has a strong social component, with the different researchers’ social networks (e.g., coauthors, people met at conferences) accounting for a important percentage of the source of the references. In this paper we report on this study and compare our results with the evidence found in a dataset of 5 × 10 authors with their publications and references. We take these results and analyze different approaches for incorporating the social component into search and recommendation of scientific publications.