Property rights in UK uplands and the implications for policy and management
Property rights in UK uplands and the implications for policy and management
复制标题
英国高地的产权及其对政策和管理的影响
DOI：
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.006
复制
发表时间：
2010
影响因子：
7
通讯作者：
Quinn C
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Quinn C
农村地区面临着不断变化且往往相互竞争的需求。在农业生产曾经是最重要的地方，它现在与其他生态系统服务竞争，如碳储存，农村市容和野生动物栖息地。如果要对农村地区进行管理，以生产如此广泛的商品和服务，就需要更加多样化和复杂的管理制度。本文探讨了在英国高地使用“产权捆绑”方法之前的产权文献，以（1）研究多资源系统中利益相关者之间的产权分配，（2）评估国家干预对产权再分配的影响以及由此产生的管理制度。研究发现，在英国的高地，私有土地所有者是主要的产权保持器持有者，私有财产是主要的管理制度。政府干预还为生物多样性等一些公共产品建立了私人国家制度，但在生态系统服务方面，共同财产管理仍处于起步阶段，很少有利益攸关方对资源拥有索赔权。因此，许多利益相关者无法影响管理层生产他们想要的产品。产权观点强调，单靠单一的管理制度不可能为私人和公共利益可持续地管理土地。相反，一个复杂的混合私人，私人国家和公共财产制度被发现出现在这个多资源系统。这些混合管理制度有可能产生可持续的成果，但前提是适当的管理制度与每种资源相匹配，在每种制度之间建立联系以处理冲突，以及混合管理具有足够的适应性以科普新的和不断变化的需求。
Rural areas are subject to changing and often competing demands. Where agricultural production was once paramount, it now competes with other ecosystem services such as carbon storage, rural amenity, and wildlife habitat. If rural areas are to be managed to produce this broad range of goods and services, then more diverse and complex management regimes are needed. This paper explores the literature on property rights before using a ‘property rights bundle’ approach in the UK uplands to (1) examine the distribution of property rights between stakeholders in a multi-resource system and (2) evaluate the effect of state intervention on the redistribution of property rights and the resulting management regimes. Private land owners were found to be the dominant type of property rights holder and private property the dominant management regime in the uplands of the UK. Government intervention has also created private-state regimes for some public goods such as biodiversity but common property management is still in its infancy with regards to ecosystem services and few stakeholders have claimant rights over resources. As a result, many stakeholders are unable to influence management to produce the goods that they want. A property rights perspective highlights that single management regimes alone are unlikely to manage land sustainably for both private and public goods. Instead, a complex mix of private, private-state and common property regimes are found to be emerging in this multi-resource system. These mixed management regimes have the potential to produce sustainable outcomes but only if the appropriate management regime is matched to each resource, if links are developed between each regime to deal with conflict and if mixed management is adaptable enough to cope with new and changing demands.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
3
作者：
M. Reed;K. Arblaster;C. Bullock;R. Burton;Althea L. Davies;J. Holden;K. Hubacek;R. May;J. Mitchley;J. Morris;D. Nainggolan;C. Potter;C. Quinn;V. Swales;S. Thorp
通讯作者：
M. Reed;K. Arblaster;C. Bullock;R. Burton;Althea L. Davies;J. Holden;K. Hubacek;R. May;J. Mitchley;J. Morris;D. Nainggolan;C. Potter;C. Quinn;V. Swales;S. Thorp
高地环境变化的驱动因素
DOI：
10.4324/9780203886724
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Bonn A
通讯作者：
Bonn A
沼泽地牲畜管理：政策变化对高地放牧、植被和农业经济的影响
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
S. Gardner;T. Waterhouse;C. Critchley
通讯作者：
C. Critchley
非洲的保有权和共同财产资源。
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
B. Cousins;C. Toulmin;J. Quan
通讯作者：
J. Quan
产权和生态系统属性
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
A. Sandberg
通讯作者：
A. Sandberg