Paradigmatic differences, power, and status: a qualitative investigation of faculty in one interdisciplinary research collaboration on sustainability science
Paradigmatic differences, power, and status: a qualitative investigation of faculty in one interdisciplinary research collaboration on sustainability science
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s11625-012-0182-4
复制
发表时间：
2013-04-01
影响因子：
6
通讯作者：
Gardner, Susan K.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gardner, Susan K.
跨学科研究合作充满挑战，包括需要克服范式差异。目前的研究试图了解25名参与可持续发展相关跨学科奋进的教师如何经历这些差异。使用Biglan的分类和Becher和Trowler的概念化，该研究发现了与该项目所涉及的软科学家和硬科学家之间的学科地位和等级制度有关的问题。
Interdisciplinary research collaborations are fraught with challenges, including the need to overcome paradigmatic differences. The current study sought to understand how 25 faculty members involved in an interdisciplinary endeavor related to sustainability experienced these differences. Using Biglan's classification and Becher and Trowler's conceptualizations, the study found issues related to disciplinary status and hierarchy between the soft and hard scientists involved in the project.