Organizational Research Methods
Organizational Research Methods
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1094428109347971
复制
发表时间：
2007-07
影响因子：
9.5
通讯作者：
R. Vandenberg
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Vandenberg
我不敢相信我作为组织研究方法（ORM）编辑的第二年已经结束了。《日刊》已经达到了一些令人难以置信的基准，下文各段将谈到这些基准。首先，我要感谢我的助理编辑Don Bergh、José Cortina、Bob Gephart、Tim Hinkin、Charles Lance和Terri Scandura，感谢他们对ORM的不懈努力和奉献。在他们写的近200封行动信中，我只收到了3封投诉和大约20封赞美信，这充分说明了他们制作这些信的质量和用心。当然，他们可以这样做，因为我在这一年中呼吁的45名编辑委员会成员（见刊头）和155名临时审查员（见2009年10月号）提供的审查质量。因此，我感谢每一位评论者从他们的日程安排中抽出时间来撰写如此强有力的评论。我还要感谢SAGE对ORM的持续支持和出版。最后，我感谢管理学会研究方法部（RMD）执行委员会对ORM的持续赞助。在谈到RMD执行委员会时，他们慷慨地邀请ORM在芝加哥的2009年管理学院会议期间使用他们的免费会议来开发一个会议，与会者可以与ORM编辑委员会见面，学习如何撰写和发布提交给ORM的手稿。除董事会成员外，45名学院成员参加了会议。许多人后来告诉我，这次会议非常成功。我个人感谢RMD的官员主办这一重要活动，并感谢所有参加的人。我很高兴在芝加哥的2009年管理学院会议上见到你们中的许多人，并有机会亲自感谢你们作为作者、审稿人和读者为ORM提供的所有支持。那些参加了周一晚上的RMD业务会议的人收到了关于ORM运营和最近成功的最新信息。请允许我花一点时间强调其中许多成果。首先，我非常高兴地宣布，SAGE已经选择José Cortina（乔治梅森大学）作为ORM的下一任主编。我的任期将于2010年6月30日结束，这意味着我将停止接收新的手稿，但继续处理那些留在我的队列中。何塞将从2010年7月1日开始接收所有新手稿，并将担任编辑至2013年6月30日。如果你有时间，请给何塞一个祝贺的便条。第二，很高兴认识到ORM编辑审查委员会选出的2008年最佳论文奖和最佳审稿人奖的获得者。今年每个奖项都有两名获奖者。2008年最佳评论家奖颁给了丹尼尔纽曼（伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳分校尚潘）和罗伯特赖特（香港理工大学）。2008年最佳论文奖之一去戈登W。Cheung（香港中文大学）的文章，题目为《Testing Equivalence in the Structure，Means，and Variances of Higher Order Constructs With Structural Equation Modeling》（ORM，第11卷，第3期，pp. 593-613，http：//orm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/11/3/593）。第二个2008年最佳论文奖去组织研究方法第13卷第1期2010年1月3-5 # 2010 SAGE出版物10.1177/1094428109347971 http://orm.sagepub.com托管在http://online.sagepub.com
I cannot believe that my second year as the editor of Organizational Research Methods (ORM) is over. A number of incredible benchmarks have been reached with respect to the journal, which will be addressed in the paragraphs below. First, however, I would like to thank my associate editors Don Bergh, José Cortina, Bob Gephart, Tim Hinkin, Charles Lance, and Terri Scandura for their continued hard work and devotion to ORM. Of the nearly 200 action letters written by them, I have received only 3 complaints and approximately 20 compliments, which speak volumes for the quality and care they use to craft those letters. Of course, they can do so because of the quality of the reviews provided by the 45 editorial board members (see masthead) and the 155 ad hoc reviewers (see the October 2009 issue) I called upon during the year. Thus, I thank each and every reviewer for taking time from their schedules to write such strong reviews. I also thank SAGE for their continued support and publication of ORM. Finally, I thank the executive committee of the Research Methods Division (RMD) of the Academy of Management for their continued sponsorship of ORM. Speaking of the RMD executive committee, they graciously invited ORM to use their free session during the 2009 Academy of Management Meeting in Chicago to develop a session in which participants could meet the ORM editorial board and learn how to write and post manuscripts for submission to ORM. In addition to the board members, 45 academy members participated in the session. I was told by many afterward that the session was a great success. I personally thank the officers of RMD for hosting this important event, and thank all of you who attended. I was delighted to see many of you at the 2009 Academy of Management Conference in Chicago and to have the opportunity to thank you in person for all the support you provide to ORM as authors, reviewers, and readers. Those of you who attended the RMD business meeting on Monday evening received updated information regarding ORM’s operation and recent successes. Let me take a moment to highlight many of those outcomes. First, it gave me great joy to announce that SAGE has selected José Cortina (George Mason University) as ORM’s next editor-in-chief. My term ends on June 30, 2010, which means that I will stop receiving new manuscripts at that point but continue to process those remaining in my queue. José will receive all new manuscripts starting July 1, 2010, and will remain as editor until June 30, 2013. If you have a moment, please drop José a congratulatory note. Second, it was a pleasure to recognize the recipients of the ORM editorial review board’s selection of the 2008 Best Paper and Best Reviewer awards. We had two recipients for each award this year. The 2008 Best Reviewer awards went to Daniel Newman (University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign) and Robert Wright (Hong Kong Polytechnic University). One of the 2008 Best Paper award went to Gordon W. Cheung (Chinese University of Hong Kong) for his article titled, Testing Equivalence in the Structure, Means, and Variances of Higher Order Constructs With Structural Equation Modeling (ORM, Vol. 11, No. 3., pp. 593– 613, http://orm.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/11/3/593). The second 2008 Best Paper award went Organizational Research Methods Volume 13 Number 1 January 2010 3-5 # 2010 SAGE Publications 10.1177/1094428109347971 http://orm.sagepub.com hosted at http://online.sagepub.com