Development of metaphor and metonymy comprehension: receptive vocabulary and conceptual knowledge.
Development of metaphor and metonymy comprehension: receptive vocabulary and conceptual knowledge.
复制标题
隐喻和转喻理解的发展：接受性词汇和概念性知识。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
影响因子：
2.3
通讯作者：
D. Annaz
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gabriella Rundblad;D. Annaz
比喻、转喻等比喻语言在日常交际中屡见不鲜。这是第一个用发展的方法研究隐喻和转喻理解的研究之一。45名典型的发展中个体参与了一项包含20个短小图片故事的隐喻-转喻言语理解任务。使用横截面轨迹分析将任务绩效与时间年龄或接受性词汇(心理年龄)联系起来，以比较隐喻和转喻的发展。研究结果表明，隐喻和转喻理解的发展与时间顺序和词汇习得密切相关，但隐喻理解的发展速度慢于转喻。研究还发现，所有年龄段的参与者在转喻方面的表现都比其他人高出约21%。从比喻性语言理解的语言学和认知性模型出发，探讨了隐喻和转喻理解之间的关系，认为转喻在认知上比隐喻更基本。
Figurative language, such as metaphor and metonymy are common in our daily communication. This is one of the first studies to investigate metaphor and metonymy comprehension using a developmental approach. Forty-five typically developing individuals participated in a metaphor-metonymy verbal comprehension task incorporating 20 short picture-stories. Cross-sectional trajectory analyses linking task performance to either chronological age or receptive vocabulary (mental age, MA) were used to compare the development of metaphor and metonymy. Results showed that development of metaphor and metonymy comprehension is strongly linked with chronological and MA, but metaphor comprehension develops at a slower rate compared to metonymy. It was also found that participants, across all ages, consistently showed around 21% better performance on metonymy. The relationship between metaphor and metonymy comprehension is discussed in terms of linguistic and cognitive models of figurative language comprehension arguing that metonymy is cognitively more basic than metaphor.
DOI：
10.1037//0278-7393.16.1.56
发表时间：
1990
期刊：
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子：
--
作者：
GibbsJr,RW
通讯作者：
GibbsJr,RW