Who pays for ethical debt in AI?
Who pays for ethical debt in AI?
复制标题
谁为人工智能的道德债务买单？
DOI：
10.1007/s43681-020-00030-3
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Cathy Petrozzino
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cathy Petrozzino
许多人工智能（例如机器学习）工具的开发都存在道德债务。它们的创建和部署没有充分检查和解决潜在的道德后果。本文更仔细地研究了人工智能中的道德债务概念及其后果。该分析重点关注两个普遍的用例：人工智能作为筛选求职者的工具，以及人工智能作为需要额外医疗服务的患者的预测工具。该分析还比较和对比了道德债务与技术债务概念的异同。本文最后讨论了决定承担道德债务的人和最终为此决定付出代价的人之间的不一致。
Many Artificial Intelligence (e.g., Machine Learning) tools are being developed with ethical debt. They are created and deployed without fully examining and addressing the potential ethical consequences. This paper looks more closely at the concept of ethical debt in Artificial Intelligence and its consequences. The analysis focuses on two prevalent use cases: Artificial Intelligence as a vehicle for screening job applicants and Artificial Intelligence as a predictor for those patients who will require extra healthcare services. The analysis also compares and contrasts the similarities and differences surrounding the concepts of ethical debt versus technical debt. The paper concludes with a discussion on the misalignment between those who decide to incur ethical debt and those who end up paying for that decision.