Sources of distinctiveness: position, difference and separateness in the identities of Anglican parish priests
Sources of distinctiveness: position, difference and separateness in the identities of Anglican parish priests
复制标题
独特性的来源：圣公会教区神父身份中的地位、差异和分离
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2002
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
G. Breakwell
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
V. Vignoles;X. Chryssochoou;G. Breakwell
我们调查了三个来源的独特性的影响，位置，差异和分离的身份和主观幸福感的调查149圣公会教区牧师。在教区和神职人员的比较背景下，独特性进行了研究。每个来源都对与每种背景下的身份元素相关的独特性的评级做出了重大而独特的贡献。教区背景下的位置强调内的身份，是积极的影响，而教区背景分离是消极的影响。在神职人员的情况下，独特性没有强调内的身份和无关的影响。这表明，独特性不是一个单一的结构：扩展现有的理论（Breakwell，1993年; Brewer，1991年; Triandis，1995年），我们认为，不同形式的独特性将根据文化和背景对身份和福祉产生不同的影响。
We investigated the implications of three sources of distinctiveness-position, difference and separateness-for identity and subjective well-being in a survey of 149 Anglican parish priests. Distinctiveness was examined within parish and clergy comparative contexts. Each source contributed substantially and uniquely to ratings of the distinctiveness associated with identity elements in each context. Parish-context position was emphasised within identity and was positive for affect, while parish-context separateness was negative for affect. Distinctiveness in the clergy context was not emphasised within identity and was unrelated to affect. This shows that distinctiveness is not a unitary construct: extending existing theories (Breakwell, 1993; Brewer, 1991; Triandis, 1995), we argue that different forms of distinctiveness will have different implications for identity and well-being according to culture and context.