Anthropocenic Limitations to Climate Engineering

Anthropocenic Limitations to Climate Engineering
复制标题

人类世对气候工程的限制

DOI:
10.3390/h8040186
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
Humanities research
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Oomen
J. Oomen
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Oomen

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

气候工程研究的发展历史上主要依赖于西方对气候和气候变化的整体看法。气候和气候变化的确定作为一个全球系统,在气候工程的发展中发挥了决定性的作用。因此,气候工程研究,特别是太阳辐射管理(SRM),主要从事量化的全地球解决方案的研究。我认为,在太阳辐射管理的潜在行动中,一种依赖于气候系统的整体西方科学的气候变化观点是神圣的。这种观点依赖于一种似乎与人类的责任和控制概念相联系的深思熟虑的意向,深刻地影响了与气候工程相关的假设和研究方法。虽然这不一定有损于气候工程提案--事实上,这可能是可持续发展管理的唯一可行概念--但这是必须承认的对企业的概念限制。此外,在治理、可靠性和文化接受度方面,这一限制可能是未来试验(或实现)的根本反对意见。
The development of climate engineering research has historically depended on mostly western, holistic perceptions of climate and climate change. Determinations of climate and climate change as a global system have played a defining role in the development of climate engineering. As a result, climate engineering research in general, and solar radiation management (SRM) in particular, is primarily engaged in research of quantified, whole-Earth solutions. I argue that in the potential act of solar radiation management, a view of climate change that relies on the holistic western science of the climatic system is enshrined. This view, dependent on a deliberative intentionality that seems connected to anthropocenic notions of responsibility and control, profoundly influences the assumptions and research methods connected to climate engineering. While this may not necessarily be to the detriment of climate engineering proposals—in fact, it may be the only workable conception of SRM—it is a conceptual limit to the enterprise that has to be acknowledged. Additionally, in terms of governance, reliability, and cultural acceptance, this limit could be a fundamental objection to future experimentation (or implementation).
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2017.1346498
发表时间: 2018-01-01
期刊: CLIMATE POLICY
影响因子: 7.1
作者:
Larkin, Alice;Kuriakose, Jaise;Anderson, Kevin
通讯作者: Anderson, Kevin