"Disarmament Debates around the 1899 Hague Peace Conference and the 1921-1922 Washington Conference: Community-Oriented Aspirations and Individual Security Concerns"
"Disarmament Debates around the 1899 Hague Peace Conference and the 1921-1922 Washington Conference: Community-Oriented Aspirations and Individual Security Concerns"
复制标题
“围绕 1899 年海牙和平会议和 1921-1922 年华盛顿会议的裁军辩论：面向社区的愿望和个人安全关切”
DOI：
10.1163/15718050-12340191
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
0.7
通讯作者：
Mika Hayashi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
岩本学;酒井啓亘;Mika Hayashi;徳永 恵美香;竹内真理;岩本学;真山全;酒井啓亘;岩本学;Nico Buitendag and Mika Hayashi;徳永 恵美香;吉田脩;岩本学;Mari Takeuchi;酒井啓亘;徳永恵美香;徳永恵美香;岩本学;Mari Takeuchi;川岸伸;Mika Hayashi;酒井啓亘;岩本学;国家の刑事管轄権;川岸伸;Mika Hayashi
当裁军在1899年海牙会议前后开始引起主要国家和国际律师的兴趣时，关于裁军法的两种截然不同的立场变得明显起来：支持者和反对者。支持者怀着面向社区的愿望，认为制定裁军法有很大的好处，而反对者出于个人的安全考虑，认为这种可能性只会产生负面后果。考虑到裁军辩论中的这两股力量，人们可能会想，1921-1922年的华盛顿会议是如何能够达成一项限制海军军备的条约的。本文试图表明，《华盛顿海军条约》不同于提倡者所设想的裁军法，它是通过精心制定的条款来限制其对海军大国安全的影响而成为可能的。
When disarmament started to interest the major states and international lawyers at around the time of the 1899 Hague Conference, two distinct positions concerning the law of disarmament became apparent: proponents and opponents. The proponents, with their community-oriented aspirations, found much merit in establishing the law of disarmament, while the opponents, with their individual security concerns, saw nothing but negative consequences for such a possibility. Given these two forces in the disarmament debate, one could wonder how the 1921–1922 Washington Conference was able to produce a treaty limiting the naval armament. This article tries to show that the Washington Naval Treaty was different from the law of disarmament that the proponents had envisioned, and that it was made possible by carefully crafted provisions to limit its own impact on the security of the naval powers.