If the State Decertified Gender, What Might Happen to its Meaning and Value?
If the State Decertified Gender, What Might Happen to its Meaning and Value?
复制标题
如果国家取消性别认证，其意义和价值可能会发生什么？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Flora Renz
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Davina Cooper;Flora Renz
随着司法管辖区改革性别身份法律以适应变性人和双性人，本文推测性地探讨了一个更根本的转变：完全消除州法律在确定和分配性别地位方面的作用。采用女权主义的角度来看，我们探讨的意义和影响，全面改革的法律的性别可能是在性别宪法作为一个社会法律的财产，不同的承认和保护，由不同的，但不平等的机构。我们的讨论沿着沿着两条交叉的路径进行。第一个问题涉及不同的分类方法，这些方法可以使州法律在不指定性别的情况下继续规范性别认同决定，从而使州法律继续参与解决性别歧视问题。第二个问题是，在州法律撤销其分配功能的情况下，性别可能采取的变化形式。这些途径在最后的讨论中汇合，讨论性别成为个人和集体培养的财产可能产生的法律的和政治影响。
As jurisdictions reform gender identity laws to accommodate transgender and intersex people, this article speculatively explores a more fundamental shift: eliminating state law’s role in determining and assigning gender status altogether. Adopting a feminist perspective, we explore what the meaning and effects of comprehensively reforming legal gender might be in terms of gender’s constitution as a socio-legal property, differentially recognised and protected by diverse but unequal bodies. Our discussion proceeds along two intersecting paths. The first concerns the different classificatory methods which could enable state law, without assigning gender, to continue to regulate gender identity decisions, thereby allowing state law to remain involved in tackling gender discrimination. The second concerns the changing form gender might take in conditions where state law withdraws its allocative function. These paths converge in a final discussion which considers what legal and political effects might follow from gender becoming a property that is individually and collectively cultivated.