Parental Recognition and the "Mew Call" in Black-Billed Gulls (Larus bulleri)
Parental Recognition and the "Mew Call" in Black-Billed Gulls (Larus bulleri)
复制标题
黑嘴鸥 (Larus bulleri) 的父母认可和“喵叫”
DOI:
10.2307/4083793
复制
发表时间:
1970
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
R. Evans
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. Evans
IN both gulls and terns (Laridae) evidence suggests that individual recognition of offspring by parents develops more or less coincident with the onset of brood mobility. Evidence that individual recognition of parents by young also develops at the same time has been obtained for the Crested Tern (Sterna bergii) (Davies and Carrick, 1962), Ring-billed Gull (Larus delawarensis) (Evans, 1966), and Laughing Gull (L. atricilla) (Beer, 1969). As individual recognition is an important means of maintaining family unity (Alley and Boyd, 1950; Ramsay, 1951), particularly after the onset of extended brood mobility in or near a congested colony (Bateson, 1966), such recognition might be expected to be particularly well-developed at an early age in colonial species whose young leave the nest and form flocks soon after hatching. The primary objective of the present study was to test this hypothesis by studying the ontogeny of parental recognition by chicks of the Black-billed Gull (L. bulleri), a highly colonial species (Black, 1955; Beer, 1965), whose relatively precocial young may leave the nesting area, often to intermingle with other broods, within 1 to 2 days after hatching (Beer, 1966). Studies of parental recognition by young Ring-billed Gulls (Evans, 1966) had indicated that chicks were able to recognize the call the parents gave repeatedly when feeding them; in the present study, the parental calls given in this context were therefore selected to test for parental recognition by the young. In Black-billed Gulls, chick feeding is typically preceded or accompanied by a soft, staccato purring that has been described as a "soft crooning sound" of 1.5 to 2 seconds duration and may be transcribed "Chrrrrrooooooo" with a smooth decrease in pitch (Beer, 1966, compare with Figures 1, 2). Comparison with the vocalizations given in similar situations by the Herring Gull (L. argentatus) (Tinbergen, 1953: 105, 135, 225; Moynihan, 1955: 143), the Black-headed Gull (L. ridibundus) (Moynihan, 1955: 45, 95), the Ring-billed Gull (Moynihan, 1958a: 111; 1958b: 121), and various other gull species (Moynihan, 1955, 1962) suggests that this call is similar in function, and possibly homologous to the "mew call" characteristic of other Larus gulls. This call in the Blackbilled Gull differs strikingly to the human ear from the comparable call of the Herring Gull that Tinbergen (1953) named the "mew call." The name "mew call" is adopted here following the usage of Moynihan (1958a: 112) who described it as "the least confusing, if not the most descriptive, of the possible alternatives."