Cross-modal feature and conjunction errors in recognition memory
Cross-modal feature and conjunction errors in recognition memory
复制标题
DOI：
10.1006/jmla.2001.2713
复制
发表时间：
2001-01-01
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
Gellis, LA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jones, TC;Jacoby, LL;Gellis, LA
四个实验进行了调查是否特定的模态熟悉有助于功能和连接错误，因此，再认记忆。在每个实验中，复合焊缝的呈现方式在研究中被操纵（听觉或视觉），并且在实验2中，用于测试的呈现方式也被操纵。在实验3中。参与者被要求迅速做出反应，以建立对熟悉而不是回忆的依赖。在实验4中，采用了直接操纵的响应截止日期。在整个实验中，听觉和视觉测试并没有产生不同的命中率或功能和连接错误率，并在研究测试方式的转变并不影响命中率或功能和连接错误率。实验4的反应期限操纵影响旧/新的歧视，但没有功能和连接效果（功能/新和连接/新的歧视），产生分离。与内隐知觉记忆不同，通道信息对特征的熟悉性和连接错误没有显著影响。特征和连接错误的熟悉性基础，从而在再认记忆中，不同于知觉内隐记忆的熟悉性基础。(C)北京：科学出版社.
Four experiments were conducted to investigate whether a modality-specific familiarity contributes to feature and conjunction errors and, hence, to recognition memory. In each experiment, the presentation modality of compound welds was manipulated at study (auditory or visual), and in Experiment 2 the presentation modality for the test also was manipulated. In Experiment 3. participants were pushed to respond quickly in order to create a reliance on familiarity rather than recollection. In Experiment 4, a direct manipulation of response deadline was employed. Across experiments, auditory and visual tests did not produce different hit tares or feature and conjunction error rates, and shifts in study-to-test modality did not affect hit rates or feature and conjunction error rates. The response deadline manipulation of Experiment 4 affected old/new discrimination but not feature and conjunction effects (feature/new and conjunction/new discrimination), producing a dissociation. Unlike implicit perceptual memory, modality information does not appear to contribute significantly to the familiarity underlying feature and conjunction errors. The familiarity underlying feature and conjunction errors, and thus in recognition memory, is different from the familiarity underlying perceptual implicit memory. (C) 2001 Academic Press.