Masculinity and nationalism: gender and sexuality in the making of nations

Masculinity and nationalism: gender and sexuality in the making of nations
复制标题

男子气概和民族主义:国家形成中的性别和性行为

DOI:
10.1080/014198798330007
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
Celebrating 40 Years of Ethnic and Racial Studies
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Joane Nagel
Joane Nagel
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Joane Nagel

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文探讨了男子气概和民族性之间的密切的历史和现代联系:通过爱国男子气概和崇高的母亲形象作为民族主义意识形态的图标的建设;通过在国家政治中为男性和女性指定性别的“地方”;通过男性利益和意识形态在民族主义运动中的主导地位;通过男性微观文化和民族主义意识形态之间的相互作用;通过性化的军国主义,包括同时构建性过度和性不足的“敌人”男人(强奸犯和懦夫)和滥交的“敌人”女人(荡妇和妓女)。三个“谜题”通过揭示男性气质和民族主义之间的联系得到部分解决:为什么许多男人如此不顾一切地捍卫男性化,单一性和异性恋的机构保留,如军事组织和学院;为什么男人去战争;和“性别差距”,也就是说,为什么男人和女人似乎有非常不同的目标和议程。
This article explores the intimate historical and modern connection between manhood and nationhood: through the construction of patriotic manhood and exalted motherhood as icons of nationalist ideology; through the designation of gendered 'places' for men and women in national politics; through the domination of masculine interests and ideology in nationalist movements; through the interplay between masculine microcultures and nationalist ideology; through sexualized militarism including the construction of simultaneously over-sexed and under-sexed 'enemy' men (rapists and wimps) and promiscuous 'enemy' women (sluts and whores). Three 'puzzles' are partially solved by exposing the connection between masculinity and nationalism: why are many men so desperate to defend masculine, monoracial, and heterosexual institutional preserves, such as military organizations and academies; why do men go to war; and the 'gender gap', that is, why do men and women appear to have very different goals and agendas for the '...