Visual comfort as a criterion for designing display units
Visual comfort as a criterion for designing display units
复制标题
视觉舒适度作为展示单元设计的标准
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1988
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Leermakers
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Roufs;M. Boschman;M. Leermakers
可以发现，为传递字母数字信息而设计的显示单元在质量上有很大的不同。设计不佳的单元不容易阅读，在长时间和高强度的会议中使用时会导致视觉疲劳。这已经引起了一些注意(例如，格兰杰，1980；Padmos，本书；Cakir，Renter，Schmude，&AmBruster，1978；Cakir，Hart，&Stewart，1979；Matula，1981)。很明显，将显示器的物理参数与视觉系统的要求相匹配是很重要的。然而，众所周知，视觉疲劳是很难测量的，因此，不是一个明显的设计标准。因此，为了寻找更合适的衡量标准，我们从两个不同的角度考察了其他标准。最直接的候选者是受试者感觉到他可以阅读屏幕上的信息的舒适度。原则上，这至少可以通过心理测量学方法来衡量。另一种方法是吸收信息的速度，这反映在阅读速度等表现指标上，或者反映在眼球跳动长度和注视持续时间等眼动特征上。
Display units designed for the transfer of alphanumeric information may be found to be quite different in quality. Badly designed units are not read easily and cause visual fatigue when used in long and intensive sessions. This has already received some attention (e.g., Grandjean, 1980; Padmos, this volume; Cakir, Renter, Schmude, & Ambruster, 1978; Cakir, Hart, & Stewart, 1979; Matula, 1981). It became apparent that it was important to match the physical parameters of the displays to the demands of the visual system. However, visual fatigue is known to be very difficult to measure and, consequently, is not an obvious design criterion. Looking for a more adequate measure, therefore, we surveyed other criteria based on two different angles of approach. The most direct candidate is the comfort with which a subject feels he can read the information on the screen. In principle this can be measured at least ordinally by psychometric methods. Another line of approach is the speed at which information is taken in, as reflected by performance measures like reading speed or by eye movement characteristics such as saccadic length and fixation duration.
负和正亮度对比度感知的对称性和恒定性。
DOI：
10.1364/josaa.1.000309
发表时间：
1984
期刊：
Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science
影响因子：
--
作者：
Burkhardt,DA;Gottesman,J;Kersten,D;Legge,GE
通讯作者：
Legge,GE