De‐centring the ‘White Gaze’ of Development

De‐centring the ‘White Gaze’ of Development
复制标题

消除发展的“白色凝视”

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
Robtel Neajai Pailey
Robtel Neajai Pailey
中科院分区:
法学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Robtel Neajai Pailey

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在其最原始的形式中,发展传统上是关于解剖所谓的全球南方的黑色,棕色和其他颜色主题的政治,社会经济和文化进程,并发现它们是倒退的,特别是与所谓的进步的全球北方相比。然而,在21世纪中期,去殖民主义的学术支点,“开放发展”从根本上要求把殖民,“白色的目光”在它的头上。特别是,当代社交媒体运动挑战白色至上,如#BlackLivesMatter,已经获得了突出地位,而非白色发展行为体,如中国,已经成为诱人的替代品。这些现象迫使开放式发展产生了积极和消极的结果、有意和无意的后果。本文旨在将批判性发展研究与批判性种族研究进行流畅的对话,探讨学者、政策制定者和实践者如何同时成功和失败地颠覆发展的“白色凝视”。
In its crudest form, development has traditionally been about dissecting the political, socio‐economic and cultural processes of black, brown and other subjects of colour in the so‐called global South and finding them regressive, particularly in comparison to the so‐called progressive global North. However, in the midst of a 21st century, de‐colonial scholarly pivot, ‘opening up development’ fundamentally demands turning the colonial, ‘white gaze’ on its head. In particular, contemporary social media movements challenging white supremacy such as #BlackLivesMatter have gained prominence while non‐white development actors such as China have emerged as enticing alternatives. These phenomena have pried open development with both positive and negative results, intended and unintended consequences. This article seeks to put Critical Development Studies into fluid conversation with Critical Race Studies in an examination of how scholars, policy makers and practitioners have simultaneously succeeded and failed in subverting the ‘white gaze’ of development.