Endoscopic Feature and Response Reproducibility in Tumor Assessment after Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Adenocarcinoma.
Endoscopic Feature and Response Reproducibility in Tumor Assessment after Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Adenocarcinoma.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1245/s10434-021-09827-w
复制
发表时间:
2021-09
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Garcia-Aguilar J
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Felder SI;Patil S;Kennedy E;Garcia-Aguilar J
Watch and Wait may be safe in selected rectal cancer patients achieving a complete clinical response following neoadjuvant treatment. Endoscopic examination is critical when determining completeness of tumor response, however, has not been systematically studied Two cross-sectional surveys, each containing endoscopic photos of rectal cancers treated with neoadjuvant therapy, were distributed to surgeons. The first survey assessed reproducibility of eight endoscopic criteria using 41 unique endoscopic photos. The percentage of surgeons selecting each of the pre-specified endoscopic criteria for each photo was calculated to determine reproducibility of endoscopic criteria in assessing treatment/tumor response grade across multiple surgeons. The second survey included endoscopic pairs of pre- and post-neoadjuvant treatment photos of 17 patients. Surgeons assigned a tumor response grade (complete clinical response, near complete, incomplete), and percentages of correct diagnostic assignment were calculated. There was significant inter- and intra-surgeon variation in the selection of pre-defined endoscopic features used to grade tumor response as well as significant inter- and intra-surgeon variation in the selection of the tumor response grade (cCR, nCR, or iCR). However, individual endoscopic features and tumor response grade clustered together, suggesting consistency in tumor response interpretation. Surgeons were more accurate in identifying patients with a complete response (82%) than patients with an incomplete response (68%). Despite inter- and intra-surgeon variation, endoscopic features were well-selected for tumor response grade, clustering together and suggesting consistency in endoscopic interpretation. Surgeons tended to under-estimate the degree of tumor response, identifying complete rather than incomplete responses more accurately.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
168.9
作者:
van der Valk, Maxime J. M.;Hilling, Denise E.;van de Velde, Cornelis J. H.
通讯作者:
van de Velde, Cornelis J. H.
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Maas M;Lambregts DM;Nelemans PJ;Heijnen LA;Martens MH;Leijtens JW;Sosef M;Hulsewé KW;Hoff C;Breukink SO;Stassen L;Beets-Tan RG;Beets GL
通讯作者:
Beets GL
影响因子:
3.9
作者:
García-Aguilar, J;de Anda, EH;Rothenberger, DA
通讯作者:
Rothenberger, DA
DOI:
10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00004-2
发表时间:
2015-08
期刊:
The Lancet. Oncology
影响因子:
--
作者:
Garcia-Aguilar J;Chow OS;Smith DD;Marcet JE;Cataldo PA;Varma MG;Kumar AS;Oommen S;Coutsoftides T;Hunt SR;Stamos MJ;Ternent CA;Herzig DO;Fichera A;Polite BN;Dietz DW;Patil S;Avila K;Timing of Rectal Cancer Response to Chemoradiation Consortium
通讯作者:
Timing of Rectal Cancer Response to Chemoradiation Consortium
影响因子:
3.9
作者:
Battersby, Nick J.;Juul, Therese;Moran, Brendan J.
通讯作者:
Moran, Brendan J.