Conservation values, the authorised heritage discourse and the conservation-planning assemblage

Conservation values, the authorised heritage discourse and the conservation-planning assemblage
复制标题

保护价值、授权的遗产话语和保护规划组合

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Pendlebury
J. Pendlebury
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Pendlebury

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文的重点是通过英国的规划系统,被称为保护规划的保护应用的实践。它认为,一个独特的保护规划的社会实体已经发展,可以被描述为一个“集合”和保护规划的价值观和有效的实践被构建为一个授权的遗产话语(AHD)。重点放在的方式,AHD可能动员的保护规划组合在其他精英话语,探索通过的方式,关系已经发展的政策领域之间的保护规划,再生和经济发展。在这样做的过程中,有人认为,保护已成功地重新定位,从被视为发展的障碍,被视为一个积极的变革因素。此外,本文提出,在保护规划AHD,我们可能会发现子AHD,周围的保护原则,遗产红利和建设性保护,每个有一个有点不同的修辞目的的短手标签组织。通过这种分析,我们可以更好地理解保护规划作为一个独特的遗产社会实体和过程。它与其他遗产活动有着共同的价值观,但也有着明显的差异,这与其与城市管理其他领域的政治关系密切相关。
The focus of this paper is the practice of conservation applied through the English planning system, termed conservation-planning. It argues that a distinct conservation-planning social entity has developed that may be described as an ‘assemblage’ and that the values and validated practice of conservation-planning are constructed as an authorised heritage discourse (AHD). Emphasis is placed upon the way that the AHD maybe mobilised by the conservation-planning assemblage in relation to other elite discourses, explored through the way that relationships have developed between the policy spheres of conservation-planning, regeneration and economic development. In doing so, it is argued conservation has successfully repositioned itself from being regarded as a barrier to development to being regarded as an active agent of change. Furthermore, the paper proposes that within the conservation-planning AHD we might detect sub-AHDs, organised around the short-hand labels of Conservation Principles, The Heritage Dividend and Constructive Conservation, each with a somewhat different rhetorical purpose. Through this analysis, we can better understand conservation-planning as a distinct heritage social entity and process. It shares values with other heritage activities but also has distinct differences, intimately related to its political relationship with other domains of urban management.