"I Had Gone to Lahore With a Message of Goodwill But in Return We Got Kargil" 1 : The Promise and Perils of "Leaps of Trust" in India-Pakistan Relations
"I Had Gone to Lahore With a Message of Goodwill But in Return We Got Kargil" 1 : The Promise and Perils of "Leaps of Trust" in India-Pakistan Relations
复制标题
“我带着善意的信息去了拉合尔，但我们得到了卡吉尔”1：印巴关系中“信任的飞跃”的承诺和危险
DOI：
10.1080/14736489.2010.506349
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
0.8
通讯作者：
Wheeler N
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Wheeler N
本章探讨了信任飞跃的概念，并将其与其他建立信任的方法区分开来。它还探讨了瓦杰帕伊如何可能采取他非凡的建立信任的举措，以及谢里夫在促进印度领导人跨越方面所发挥的作用。思考在印度和巴基斯坦之间建立信任的可能性的起点是认识到安全困境这一概念的重要性。这一章假定巴基斯坦领导人真诚地致力于与瓦杰帕伊合作发展合作关系。它通过审查谢里夫与他的将军们计划在卡吉尔发动袭击，在多大程度上欺骗了瓦杰帕伊来做到这一点。这一章考虑的是，在卡吉尔之后，使拉合尔取得突破成为可能的信任是否完全消失。信任的概念在国际关系的理论和实践中被边缘化，它认为，这对探索一个拥有核武器的世界的可行替代办法产生了负面后果。
This chapter explores the concept of a leap of trust and distinguishes it from other approaches to trust-building. It also explores how it became possible for Vajpayee to make his extraordinary trust-building move and the role that Sharif played in facilitating the Indian leaders leap. The starting point for thinking about the possibilities of building trust between India and Pakistan is recognition of the importance of the concept of the security dilemma. The chapter assumes that the Pakistani leader was genuinely committed to working with Vajpayee in developing a cooperative relationship. It does so by examining how far Sharif deceived Vajpayee by planning with his generals the attack at Kargil. The chapter considers whether the trust that had made possible the breakthrough at Lahore completely disappeared after Kargil. The concept of trust has been marginalised in the theory and practice of international relations and it argues that this has had negative consequences for exploring viable alternatives to a nuclear-armed world.