Rural Capitalists in India, Indonesia, and Malaysia; Three Cases, Two Debates, One Analysis?
Rural Capitalists in India, Indonesia, and Malaysia; Three Cases, Two Debates, One Analysis?
复制标题
印度、印度尼西亚和马来西亚的农村资本家；
作者：
M. Rutten
南亚和东南亚农村创业研究存在不同的解释，但有共同的实证主题。大多数研究都是基于一个国家的经验数据收集，并在特定于相关亚洲次区域的分析框架内提供数据。对南亚创业阶层的研究倾向于关注创业行为的结构方面，而对东南亚创业阶层的研究则倾向于关注其行为的文化方面。通过比较印度、印度尼西亚和马来西亚的印度教、穆斯林和中国农村资本家的实地调查结果，本文认为，研究的实证主题类型有足够的共同点，可以建立一个统一的比较框架，这将使我们更好地了解南亚和东南亚企业家阶层的出现。
There are divergent explanations but common empirical themes in the study of rural entrepreneurship in South and Southeast Asia. Most studies are based on empirical data collection in one country and present their data within an analytical framework that is specific to the particular Asian sub-region concerned. Studies on the entrepreneurial class in South Asia tend to focus on the structural aspects of entrepreneurial behaviour, while studies on the entrepreneurial class in Southeast Asia tend to focus on the cultural aspects of their behaviour. By comparing the findings of field-work among Hindu, Muslim, and Chinese rural capitalists in India, Indonesia, and Malaysia, this paper argues that there is sufficient common ground in the type of empirical subject studied for a unified, comparative framework to be developed which will give us a better understanding into the emergence of the entrepreneurial class in both South and Southeast Asia.