Realism of confidence in sensory discrimination
Realism of confidence in sensory discrimination
复制标题
DOI：
10.3758/bf03206187
复制
发表时间：
1999-10-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Petrusic, WM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Baranski, JV;Petrusic, WM
对人类判断的信心有没有一个共同和普遍的基础？最近，我们发现感觉领域的自信判断反映了先前在认知领域建立的那些属性；值得注意的是，我们发现在简单感觉判断上缺乏自信，在硬感觉判断上过度自信。相比之下，来自瑞典乌普萨拉实验室的数据表明，感官判断是独一无二的；他们发现普遍存在自信不足的偏见，过度自信只有在非常艰难的感官判断中才明显。Olsson和Winman(1996)试图基于与视觉辨别任务中刺激显示的特征相关的方法学问题来解决这一争论。对Baranski和Petrusic(1994)报告的数据的重新分析，以及一项控制刺激显示特征的新实验的发现，支持了加拿大和瑞典数据之间的差异是真实的这一观点，因此，可能反映了感觉辨别信心的跨国差异。
Is there a common and general basis for confidence in human judgment? Recently, we found that the properties of confidence judgments in the sensory domain mirror those previously established in the cognitive domain; notably, we found underconfidence on easy sensory judgments and overconfidence on hard sensory judgments. In contrast, data from the Uppsala laboratory in Sweden suggest that sensory judgments are unique; they found a pervasive underconfidence bias, with overconfidence being evident only on very hard sensory judgments. Olsson and Winman (1996) attempted to resolve the debate on the basis of methodological issues related to features of the stimulus display in a visual discrimination task. A reanalysis of the data reported in Baranski and Petrusic (1994), together with the findings of a new experiment that controlled stimulus display characteristics, supports the position that the difference between the Canadian and the Swedish data is real and, thus, may reflect cross-national differences in confidence in sensory discrimination.