Agreement among judges of personality: interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship.
Agreement among judges of personality: interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.656
复制
发表时间：
1995-10
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
D. Funder;David C. Kolar;M. Blackman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
D. Funder;David C. Kolar;M. Blackman
对184名被试的人格评价分别由自我、大学同学、家乡同学、父母和陌生人提供。研究1发现，在相同的背景下，知道的目标增强，但不是必要的法官间的协议和熟人谁从来没有见过彼此同意，以及那些谁见过。研究2发现，熟人的人格判断表现出更好的判断和自我他人的判断比陌生人。与陌生人相比，熟人与他们的目标并不更相似，他们的准确性更多地来自他们对目标的独特判断，而不是假设的相似性。这些结果排除了重叠，沟通，并假设相似性作为必要的基础，法官间的协议，从而支持更简单的假设，即法官间的协议源于相互的准确性。
Personality judgments of 184 targets were provided by the self, college acquaintances, hometown acquaintances, parents, and strangers. Study 1 found that knowing the target in the same context enhanced but was not necessary for interjudge agreement and that acquaintances who had never met agreed with each other as well as those who had met. Study 2 found that personality judgements by acquaintances manifested much better interjudge and self-other agreement than did judgments by strangers. Acquaintances were not more similar to their targets than were strangers, and their accuracy derived more from their distinctive judgment of the target than from assumed similarity. These results rule out overlap, communication, and assumed similarity as necessary bases of interjudge agreement and thereby support the simpler hypothesis that interjudge agreement stems from mutual accuracy.