Dislocations in solids
Dislocations in solids
复制标题
DOI:
10.1107/s0108767388014606
复制
发表时间:
1989-07
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
A. Parasnis
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Parasnis
* If the rotation angle is not 180, then the sense of rotation must also be conserved. The normalizer then lacks mirror planes through b, for instance. However this does not change its invariant subspaces. reflection in a plane, for example, the normalizer contains all parallel translations, reflections in all perpendicular planes, etc. The short and rather obvious description in the second column of Table 3 is, however, sufficient to yield the invariant subspaces listed in the third column. This latter column is in accordance with the second column of Table 1. The ensuing definition hence becomes: the geometric element of a symmetry operation W consists of the subspace (s) invariant for all operations belonging to the Euclidean normalizer of W.The following remarks apply to Table 3:(i) The occurrence of three items for the rotoinversion (instead of two in Table 1) is not a discrepancy: if the point is invariant, invariance of the line follows from that of the plane, and vice versa. Hence, one of the latter two is redundant.(ii)'Subspace'should be taken in the proper sense, because in the improper sense ('all space') it is invariant for any congruence. It would have to be added to all geometric elements but would not increase their information content.(iii) The invariance need only obtain for the subspace as a whole, not necessarily pointwise as required in the SCIPRO definition.(iv) It should be noted that the congruence operations referred to above are operations in point space (see ITA83, § 8.1. 5), not vector space. The given definition of geometric elements hence applies to symmetry operations in point space only, not to those in vector space.