Continuous Negative Extrathoracic Pressure and Positive End-Expiratory Pressure: A Comparative Study in Escherichia coli Endotoxin-Treated Neonatal Piglets
Continuous Negative Extrathoracic Pressure and Positive End-Expiratory Pressure: A Comparative Study in Escherichia coli Endotoxin-Treated Neonatal Piglets
复制标题
持续胸外负压和呼气末正压:大肠杆菌内毒素处理的新生仔猪的比较研究
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1995
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
D. Easa
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
T. Mundie;K. Finn;V. Balaraman;S. Sood;D. Easa
Recent clinical studies have suggested that improvement in pulmonary gas exchange with the use of continuous negative extrathoracic pressure (CNEP) in conjunction with intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) may be due to increased pulmonary blood flow. Accordingly, we investigated the effects of CNEP vs positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in ventilated neonatal piglets after Escherichia coli endotoxin was administered to induce pulmonary hypertension. Two experimental groups of piglets with six in each, were subjected to three 30-min alternating periods—6 cm H 2 O CNEP with 6 cm H 2 O PEEP, beginning 2 h after endotoxin infusion. End-expiratory lung volume (EELV) increased similarly from baseline (13±2 mL/kg) with both CNEP (28±2 mL/kg) and PEEP (29±2 mL/kg). In addition, the increase in PaO 2 from baseline with CNEP (106±9 to 135±7 mm Hg) was similar to that with PEEP (114±11 to 132±6 mm Hg). Further, no differences were found in dynamic lung compliance, EELV, lung resistance, blood gas indexes, or hemodynamics, including transmural pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance between CNEP and PEEP. With transpulmonary pressure and transrespiratory pressure equal, CNEP in tandem with IMV is physiologically equivalent to PEEP and IMV.
影响因子:
5.4
作者:
Shinbori, T;Walczak, H;Krammer, PH
通讯作者:
Krammer, PH