Restorative justice and democracy: fostering public accountability for criminal justice
Restorative justice and democracy: fostering public accountability for criminal justice
复制标题
恢复性司法和民主：促进刑事司法的公共责任
DOI：
10.1080/10282580.2011.616367
复制
发表时间：
2011
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Dzur
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Dzur
本文探讨了恢复性司法的民主方面，把它放在一个更普遍的公民参与运动的背景下，试图缩小公民和国家之间的距离。沿着的目标是促进受害者、罪犯和社区之间的愈合对话，从而导致宽恕和恢复损失，而不是补偿性的刑事伤害，恢复性司法计划，如佛蒙特州的赔偿性缓刑计划，试图分担刑事司法可怕任务的责任和决策权。在过去的35年里，虽然恢复性司法方案已经变得更加普遍和主流，但其民主方面仍然不发达。本文批判性地反思了恢复性司法项目在刑事司法管理的专业领域中让公众参与的程度，以及它们在规则约束的官僚环境中如何运作，同时保持非正式和向社区成员开放。报告还评估了恢复性司法作为一项改革运动，在多大程度上解决了所谓的民粹主义惩罚问题，许多评论家认为，民粹主义惩罚推动了"坚韧“的刑事司法政策，如强制性最低量刑，使美国成为目前世界上监禁的领导者。
This essay examines the democratic aspects of restorative justice, placing it in the context of a more general civic engagement movement attempting to narrow the distance between citizens and the state. Along with the goals of fostering healing dialogs between victims, offenders, and communities that can lead to forgiveness and restoration of loss rather than compensatory penal harm, restorative justice programs such as the Vermont reparative probation program attempt to share responsibility and decision-making power for the awful tasks of criminal justice. Over the last 35 years, while restorative justice programs have become more widespread and more mainstream, their democratic dimensions have remained underdeveloped. This essay critically reflects on the degree to which restorative justice programs have involved the public in the professional domain of criminal justice administration and how well they have managed to operate within rule-bound bureaucratic environments while remaining informal and open to community members. It also assesses how well restorative justice, as a reform movement, has addressed the so-called populist punitiveness many commentators believe has driven the ‘get tough’ criminal justice policies, such as mandatory minimum sentencing, that make the US the current world leader in imprisonment.
围绕国家制度选举、国家、警察的一些“周边”问题(2)
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2006
期刊：
Local autonomy forum(Tokyo) February 2006 issue
影响因子：
--
作者：
ITO;Masatsugu
通讯作者：
Masatsugu