Recurrent Large Earthquakes in a Fault Region: What Can Be Inferred from Small and Intermediate Events?
Recurrent Large Earthquakes in a Fault Region: What Can Be Inferred from Small and Intermediate Events?
复制标题
断层区经常发生的大地震:从中小型和中型事件可以推断出什么?
DOI:
10.1785/0120080146
复制
发表时间:
2008
影响因子:
3
通讯作者:
M. Holschneider
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
G. Zöller;S. Hainzl;M. Holschneider
We present a renewal model for the recurrence of large earthquakes in a fault zone consisting of a major fault and surrounding smaller faults with Gutenberg–Richter-type seismicity represented by seismic moment release drawn from a truncated power-law distribution. The recurrence times of characteristic earthquakes for the major fault are explored. It is continuously loaded (plate motion) and undergoes positive and negative fluctuations due to adjacent smaller faults, with a large number N eq of such changes between two major earthquakes. Because the distribution has a finite variance, in the limit N eq→∞ the central limit theorem implies that the recurrence times follow a Brownian passage-time (BPT) distribution. This allows us to calculate individual recurrence-time distributions for specific fault zones without tuning free parameters: the mean recurrence time can be estimated from geological or paleoseismic data, and the standard deviation is determined from the frequency-size distribution, namely, the Richter b -value, of an earthquake catalog. The approach is demonstrated for the Parkfield segment of the San Andreas fault in California as well as for a long simulation of a numerical fault model. Assuming power-law distributed earthquake magnitudes up to the size of the recurrent Parkfield event ( M 6), we find a coefficient of variation that is higher than the value obtained by a direct fit of the BPT distribution to seven large earthquakes. We argue that the BPT distribution is a reasonable choice for seismic hazard assessment because it governs not only Brownian motion with drift but also models with power-law statistics for the recurrence of large earthquakes in an asymptotic limit. Finally, we find that the condition b =1 separates two regimes: in the first ( b 1) it is greater.