Are freely chosen actions generated by stimulus codes or effect codes?
Are freely chosen actions generated by stimulus codes or effect codes?
复制标题
DOI：
10.3758/s13414-020-02081-4
复制
发表时间：
2020-10
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Kunde W
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Janczyk M;Naefgen C;Kunde W
一个长期存在的争论围绕着哪些心理密码允许人类控制行为。内部刺激模型（可以追溯到Rudolf Hermann Lotze）提出，行为是由先前在相应的运动活动之前的刺激代码控制的。内部效应模型（追溯到Emil Harleß）提出，行为是由先前由相应的运动活动产生的感知效应代码控制的。在这里，我们提出了这两个控制模型的测试。我们观察到两种模型的证据，内部刺激模型的证据更强。我们认为，所提出的实验设置可能是研究不同情境下刺激控制和效应控制的相对优势的有用工具。
A long-standing debate revolves around which mental codes allow humans to control behavior. The internal stimulus model (going back to Rudolf Hermann Lotze) proposes that behavior is controlled by codes of stimuli that had previously preceded corresponding motor activities. The internal effect model (going back to Emil Harleß) proposes that behavior is controlled by codes of perceptual effects that had previously resulted from corresponding motor activities. Here, we present a test of these two control models. We observed evidence for both models with stronger evidence for the internal stimulus model. We suggest that the proposed experimental setup might be a useful tool to study the relative strengths of stimulus control and effect control of behavior in various contexts.