Enslaving the Algorithm: From a "Right to an Explanation" to a "Right to Better Decisions"?
Enslaving the Algorithm: From a "Right to an Explanation" to a "Right to Better Decisions"?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1109/msp.2018.2701152
复制
发表时间：
2018-05-01
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
Veale, Michael
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Edwards, Lilian;Veale, Michael
随着对黑箱机器学习系统中歧视的担忧上升，法律的“解释权”已成为一种有吸引力的治理方法。关于算法逻辑的有意义的信息在技术上比通常认为的更有可能，但这有可能导致一种新的“透明度谬误”--一种对实质性条款的补救幻想。
As concerns about discrimination in black box machine learning systems rise, a legal "right to an explanation" has emerged as an attractive approach for governance. Meaningful information about algorithmic logics is more technically possible than commonly thought, but this risks a new "transparency fallacy"-an illusion of remedy over a substantive provision.