An Empirical Comparison of Graph Databases
An Empirical Comparison of Graph Databases
复制标题
图数据库的实证比较
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Valentin Vansteenberghe
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Salim Jouili;Valentin Vansteenberghe
近年来，越来越多的公司提供了使用关系数据库有效实现的服务。因此，这些公司被迫使用替代数据库模型，例如XML数据库，面向对象的数据库，面向文档的数据库以及最近的Graph数据库。图数据库仅存在几年。尽管已经进行了一些比较尝试，但它们主要集中在某些方面。在本文中，我们提出了一个分布式图形数据库比较框架，以及通过比较图形数据库市场中的四个重要参与者获得的结果：Neo4J，Orient DB，Titan和Dex。
In recent years, more and more companies provide services that can not be anymore achieved efficiently using relational databases. As such, these companies are forced to use alternative database models such as XML databases, object-oriented databases, document-oriented databases and, more recently graph databases. Graph databases only exist for a few years. Although there have been some comparison attempts, they are mostly focused on certain aspects only. In this paper, we present a distributed graph database comparison framework and the results we obtained by comparing four important players in the graph databases market: Neo4j, Orient DB, Titan and DEX.